GeForce FX 5200LE vs GeForce4 MX 4000

NVIDIA

GeForce FX 5200LE

2025Core: 2017 MHzBoost: 2407 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce4 MX 4000

2020Core: 1395 MHzBoost: 1575 MHz
Similar parts
······

GeForce FX 5200LE vs GeForce4 MX 4000 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce FX 5200LE vs GeForce4 MX 4000 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce FX 5200LE vs GeForce4 MX 4000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce FX 5200LE

2025

Why buy it

  • +40% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($43 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Better long-term bet: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 2200% higher power demand at 575W vs 25W.

GeForce4 MX 4000

2020

Why buy it

  • Draws 25W instead of 575W, a 550W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark G3D performance (5 vs 7).
  • 2020 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $43 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce FX 5200LE is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 40% in PassMark G3D (7 vs 5), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce FX 5200LE is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 5nm process instead of 12nm, 170 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2025 generation instead of 2020. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce FX 5200LE makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce FX 5200LE vs GeForce4 MX 4000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce FX 5200LE

The GeForce FX 5200LE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 30 2025. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock ranges from 2017 MHz to 2407 MHz. It has 21760 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 575W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 170 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7 points. Launch price was $1,999.

NVIDIA

GeForce4 MX 4000

The GeForce4 MX 4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 1 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1575 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce FX 5200LE scores 7 versus the GeForce4 MX 4000's 5 — the GeForce FX 5200LE leads by 40%. The GeForce FX 5200LE is built on Rankine while the GeForce4 MX 4000 uses Turing, both on 5 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 21,760 (GeForce FX 5200LE) vs 896 (GeForce4 MX 4000). Raw compute: 104.8 TFLOPS (GeForce FX 5200LE) vs 3.226 TFLOPS (GeForce4 MX 4000). Boost clocks: 2407 MHz vs 1575 MHz.

FeatureGeForce FX 5200LEGeForce4 MX 4000
G3D Mark Score
7+40%
5
Architecture
Rankine
Turing
Process Node
5 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
21760+2329%
896
Compute (TFLOPS)
104.8 TFLOPS+3149%
3.226 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
2407 MHz+53%
1575 MHz
ROPs
176+450%
32
TMUs
680+963%
64

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce FX 5200LEGeForce4 MX 4000
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce FX 5200LE and 64-bit on the GeForce4 MX 4000.

FeatureGeForce FX 5200LEGeForce4 MX 4000
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0a (GeForce FX 5200LE) vs 7.0 (GeForce4 MX 4000). OpenGL: 1.5 vs 1.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce FX 5200LEGeForce4 MX 4000
DirectX
9.0a+29%
7.0
OpenGL
1.5
1.5
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce FX 5200LE) vs None (GeForce4 MX 4000). Decoder: No vs MPEG-2 Decoder. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce FX 5200LE) vs MPEG-2 (GeForce4 MX 4000).

FeatureGeForce FX 5200LEGeForce4 MX 4000
Encoder
No
None
Decoder
No
MPEG-2 Decoder
Codecs
MPEG-2
MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce FX 5200LE draws 575W versus the GeForce4 MX 4000's 25W — a 183.3% difference. The GeForce4 MX 4000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce FX 5200LE) vs 350W (GeForce4 MX 4000). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 168mm vs 168mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 60°C.

FeatureGeForce FX 5200LEGeForce4 MX 4000
TDP
575W
25W-96%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
PCIe-powered
Length
168mm
168mm
Height
111mm
100mm
Slots
1
1
Temp (Load)
65°C
60°C-8%
Perf/Watt
0.0
0.2
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce FX 5200LE came in at $43, while the GeForce4 MX 4000 launched at $0. On MSRP, GeForce4 MX 4000 was 100+% cheaper ($43 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.2 (GeForce FX 5200LE) vs Infinity (GeForce4 MX 4000) — the GeForce4 MX 4000 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is GeForce FX 5200LE (2025 vs 2020).

FeatureGeForce FX 5200LEGeForce4 MX 4000
MSRP
$43
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
0.2
Infinity
Codename
GB202
N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1
Release
January 30 2025
August 1 2020
Ranking
#3
#523

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.