
GRID M60-4Q vs GeForce GTX 680MX

GRID M60-4Q
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 680MX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GRID M60-4Q is positioned at rank 318 and the GeForce GTX 680MX is on rank 79, so the GeForce GTX 680MX offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GRID M60-4Q
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 680MX
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GRID M60-4Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.8% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTX 680MX offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GRID M60-4Q | GeForce GTX 680MX |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GRID M60-4Q remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID M60-4Q and GeForce GTX 680MX

GRID M60-4Q
The GRID M60-4Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,831 points.

GeForce GTX 680MX
The GeForce GTX 680MX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 23 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 720 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 122W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,799 points.
Graphics Performance
The GRID M60-4Q scores 3,831 and the GeForce GTX 680MX reaches 3,799 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M60-4Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 680MX uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID M60-4Q) vs 1,536 (GeForce GTX 680MX).
| Feature | GRID M60-4Q | GeForce GTX 680MX |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,831 | 3,799 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+33% | 1536 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID M60-4Q | GeForce GTX 680MX |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GRID M60-4Q comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 680MX has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 680MX offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | GRID M60-4Q | GeForce GTX 680MX |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 256-bit+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GRID M60-4Q) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 680MX). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GRID M60-4Q | GeForce GTX 680MX |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (11_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Maxwell) (GRID M60-4Q) vs NVENC (Kepler) (GeForce GTX 680MX). Decoder: NVDEC vs NVDEC (Kepler). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9 (GRID M60-4Q) vs H.264,MPEG-1,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 680MX).
| Feature | GRID M60-4Q | GeForce GTX 680MX |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Maxwell) | NVENC (Kepler) |
| Decoder | NVDEC | NVDEC (Kepler) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9 | H.264,MPEG-1,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID M60-4Q draws 225W versus the GeForce GTX 680MX's 122W — a 59.4% difference. The GeForce GTX 680MX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M60-4Q) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 680MX). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80.
| Feature | GRID M60-4Q | GeForce GTX 680MX |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 122W-46% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 80-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 17.0 | 31.1+83% |
Value Analysis
The GRID M60-4Q is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2012).
| Feature | GRID M60-4Q | GeForce GTX 680MX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2500 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $120 | — |
| Codename | GM204 | — |
| Release | August 30 2015 | October 23 2012 |
| Ranking | #433 | #520 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















