GRID M60-4Q vs T400 4GB

GRID M60-4Q

2015Core: 557 MHzBoost: 1178 MHz
Similar parts
··
VS

T400 4GB

2021Core: 420 MHzBoost: 1425 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GRID M60-4Q vs T400 4GB Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID M60-4Q vs T400 4GB: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID M60-4Q

2015

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • 2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 1472.3% HIGHER MSRP
    $2,500 MSRPvs$159 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.5 vs 23.9 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
  • 650% higher power demand at 225W vs 30W.
  • 71.2% longer card at 267mm vs 156mm.

T400 4GB

2021

Why buy it

  • Costs $2,341 less on MSRP ($159 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
  • Delivers 1460.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 23.9 vs 1.5 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
  • GRID M60-4Q is already obsolete for modern gaming, so T400 4GB is the less risky modern option long term.
  • Draws 30W instead of 225W, a 195W reduction.
  • Measures 156mm instead of 267mm, a 111mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GRID M60-4Q is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.7% in PassMark G3D (3,831 vs 3,803), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
T400 4GB is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 12nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2021 generation instead of 2015. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
T400 4GB makes the most sense to buy today. It is $2,341 cheaper on MSRP at $159 vs $2,500, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1460.8% (23.9 vs 1.5), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. GRID M60-4Q still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GRID M60-4Q vs T400 4GB Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GRID M60-4Q

The GRID M60-4Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,831 points.

T400 4GB

The T400 4GB is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in May 6 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 420 MHz to 1425 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,803 points.

Graphics Performance

The GRID M60-4Q scores 3,831 and the T400 4GB reaches 3,803 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M60-4Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the T400 4GB uses Turing, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID M60-4Q) vs 384 (T400 4GB). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M60-4Q) vs 1.094 TFLOPS (T400 4GB). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 1425 MHz.

FeatureGRID M60-4QT400 4GB
G3D Mark Score
3,831
3,803
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
Turing
Process Node
28 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
2048+433%
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
4.825 TFLOPS+341%
1.094 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1178 MHz
1425 MHz+21%
ROPs
64+300%
16
TMUs
128+433%
24
L1 Cache
768 KB+100%
384 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB+100%
1 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGRID M60-4QT400 4GB
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID M60-4Q and 64-bit on the T400 4GB. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID M60-4Q) vs 1 MB (T400 4GB) — the GRID M60-4Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGRID M60-4QT400 4GB
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB+100%
1 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GRID M60-4Q) vs 12_0 (T400 4GB). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

FeatureGRID M60-4QT400 4GB
DirectX
12
12_0
Max Displays
4+33%
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Maxwell) (GRID M60-4Q) vs NVENC 7th Gen (T400 4GB). Decoder: NVDEC vs NVDEC 4th Gen.

FeatureGRID M60-4QT400 4GB
Encoder
NVENC (Maxwell)
NVENC 7th Gen
Decoder
NVDEC
NVDEC 4th Gen
Codecs
H.264,H.265,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID M60-4Q draws 225W versus the T400 4GB's 30W — a 152.9% difference. The T400 4GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M60-4Q) vs 350W (T400 4GB). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 156mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.

FeatureGRID M60-4QT400 4GB
TDP
225W
30W-87%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
267mm
156mm
Slots
2
1-50%
Temp (Load)
85°C
Perf/Watt
17.0
126.8+646%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID M60-4Q came in at $2500, while the T400 4GB launched at $159. On MSRP, T400 4GB was 93.6% cheaper ($2341 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.5 (GRID M60-4Q) vs 23.9 (T400 4GB) — the T400 4GB offers 1493.3% better value. The newer card here is T400 4GB (2021 vs 2015).

FeatureGRID M60-4QT400 4GB
MSRP
$2500
$159-94%
Performance per Dollar
1.5
23.9+1493%
Codename
GM204
TU117
Release
August 30 2015
May 6 2021
Ranking
#433
#518

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.