
GRID P40-12Q vs GeForce GTX 680

GRID P40-12Q
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 680
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GRID P40-12Q is positioned at rank #351 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GRID P40-12Q
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 680 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID P40-12Q.
| Insight | GRID P40-12Q | GeForce GTX 680 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (256mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 680 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 680 holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $5,699), it costs 99% less, resulting in a 14325% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GRID P40-12Q | GeForce GTX 680 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+14325%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($5,699) | ✅More affordable ($40) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID P40-12Q and GeForce GTX 680

GRID P40-12Q
The GRID P40-12Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,540 points.

GeForce GTX 680
The GeForce GTX 680 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 1006 MHz to 1058 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 195W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,609 points. Launch price was $499.
Graphics Performance
The GRID P40-12Q scores 5,540 and the GeForce GTX 680 reaches 5,609 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID P40-12Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 680 uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID P40-12Q) vs 1,536 (GeForce GTX 680). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID P40-12Q) vs 3.25 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 680). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 1058 MHz.
| Feature | GRID P40-12Q | GeForce GTX 680 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,540 | 5,609+1% |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+33% | 1536 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.825 TFLOPS+48% | 3.25 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz+11% | 1058 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 128 | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB+500% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID P40-12Q | GeForce GTX 680 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID P40-12Q) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 680) — the GRID P40-12Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID P40-12Q | GeForce GTX 680 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID P40-12Q draws 225W versus the GeForce GTX 680's 195W — a 14.3% difference. The GeForce GTX 680 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID P40-12Q) vs 550W (GeForce GTX 680). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin.
| Feature | GRID P40-12Q | GeForce GTX 680 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 195W-13% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-36% | 550W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 256mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 98°C |
| Perf/Watt | 24.6 | 28.8+17% |
Value Analysis
The GRID P40-12Q launched at $5699 MSRP and currently averages $5699, while the GeForce GTX 680 launched at $499 and now averages $40. The GeForce GTX 680 costs 99.3% less ($5659 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 1.0 (GRID P40-12Q) vs 140.2 (GeForce GTX 680) — the GeForce GTX 680 offers 13920% better value. The GRID P40-12Q is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2012).
| Feature | GRID P40-12Q | GeForce GTX 680 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $5699 | $499-91% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $5699 | $40-99% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.0 | 140.2+13920% |
| Codename | GM204 | GK104 |
| Release | August 30 2015 | March 22 2012 |
| Ranking | #433 | #410 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












