GRID P40-1Q vs GRID V100-2Q
GRID P40-1Q
Popular choices:
GRID V100-2Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GRID P40-1Q is positioned at rank 332 and the GRID V100-2Q is on rank 390, so the GRID P40-1Q offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GRID P40-1Q
Performance Per Dollar GRID V100-2Q
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GRID P40-1Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID V100-2Q.
| Insight | GRID P40-1Q | GRID V100-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GRID P40-1Q offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GRID P40-1Q holds the technical lead. Priced at $150 (vs $2,000), it costs 93% less, resulting in a 1243.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GRID P40-1Q | GRID V100-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1243.1%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($150) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($2,000) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID P40-1Q and GRID V100-2Q
GRID P40-1Q
The GRID P40-1Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,839 points.
GRID V100-2Q
The GRID V100-2Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,811 points.
Graphics Performance
The GRID P40-1Q scores 3,839 and the GRID V100-2Q reaches 3,811 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID P40-1Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the GRID V100-2Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID P40-1Q) vs 2,048 (GRID V100-2Q). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID P40-1Q) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID V100-2Q). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 1178 MHz.
| Feature | GRID P40-1Q | GRID V100-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,839 | 3,811 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.825 TFLOPS | 4.825 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | 1178 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 128 | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB | 768 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID P40-1Q | GRID V100-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GRID P40-1Q | GRID V100-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID P40-1Q draws 225W versus the GRID V100-2Q's 225W — a 0% difference. The GRID V100-2Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID P40-1Q) vs 350W (GRID V100-2Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GRID P40-1Q | GRID V100-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 1mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 17.1+1% | 16.9 |
Value Analysis
The GRID P40-1Q launched at $3000 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the GRID V100-2Q launched at $10000 and now averages $2000. The GRID P40-1Q costs 92.5% less ($1850 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 25.6 (GRID P40-1Q) vs 1.9 (GRID V100-2Q) — the GRID P40-1Q offers 1247.4% better value.
| Feature | GRID P40-1Q | GRID V100-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3000-70% | $10000 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150-93% | $2000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 25.6+1247% | 1.9 |
| Codename | GM204 | GM204 |
| Release | August 30 2015 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #525 | #433 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GRID P40-1Q and GRID V100-2Q
