GeForce GTX 1650
VS
FirePro V7000

GeForce GTX 1650 vs FirePro V7000

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

2019Core: 1485 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz
VS

FirePro V7000

2012Core: 950 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro V7000

#102
Radeon Pro Vega II Duo
MSRP: $4399|Avg: $3500
91%
#103
Radeon Pro W6800X Duo
MSRP: $4999|Avg: $4999
84%
#104
Radeon Pro W6900X
MSRP: $6000|Avg: $5000
82%
#105
Quadro RTX 6000
MSRP: $6300|Avg: $1800
81%
#228
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
4197%
#243
FirePro V7000
MSRP: $899|Avg: $100
100%
#244
Quadro P500
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
94%
#246
FireStream 9370
MSRP: $800|Avg: $50
90%
#247
GRID K260Q
MSRP: $937|Avg: $15
89%
#249
Quadro 600
MSRP: $179|Avg: $20
83%
#251
Quadro 410
MSRP: $149|Avg: $25
82%
#253
FirePro W600
MSRP: $599|Avg: $30
80%
#254
L2
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $1500
78%
#255
FirePro W8100
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $200
78%
#256
Quadro K5200
MSRP: $2250|Avg: $70
78%
#257
Quadro K2000D
MSRP: $599|Avg: $35
76%
#258
FirePro V7800
MSRP: $759|Avg: $96
76%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce GTX 1650 is significantly newer (2019 vs 2012). The GeForce GTX 1650 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The FirePro V7000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 148.9% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the FirePro V7000.

InsightGeForce GTX 1650FirePro V7000
Performance
Leading raw performance (+148.9%)
Lower raw frame rates (-148.9%)
Longevity
Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $75 versus $100 for the FirePro V7000, it costs 25% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 231.8% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightGeForce GTX 1650FirePro V7000
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+231.8%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($75)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($100)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and FirePro V7000

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

AMD

FirePro V7000

The FirePro V7000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 27 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 950 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,162 points. Launch price was $1,249.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the FirePro V7000's 3,162 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 148.9%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the FirePro V7000 uses GCN 1.0, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1,280 (FirePro V7000). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2.432 TFLOPS (FirePro V7000).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650FirePro V7000
G3D Mark Score
7,869+149%
3,162
Architecture
Turing
GCN 1.0
Process Node
12 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
896
1280+43%
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.984 TFLOPS+23%
2.432 TFLOPS
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
56
80+43%
L1 Cache
896 KB+180%
320 KB
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
0.5 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650FirePro V7000
Upscaling Tech
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 0.5 MB (FirePro V7000) — the GeForce GTX 1650 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650FirePro V7000
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
0.5 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12 (FirePro V7000). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 6.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650FirePro V7000
DirectX
12
12
Vulkan
1.4+17%
1.2
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
3
6+100%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs VCE 1.0 (FirePro V7000). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs UVD. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro V7000).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650FirePro V7000
Encoder
NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
VCE 1.0
Decoder
NVDEC 4th gen
UVD
Codecs
H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the FirePro V7000's 150W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (FirePro V7000). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 242mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75°C.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650FirePro V7000
TDP
75W-50%
150W
Recommended PSU
300W-14%
350W
Power Connector
None
PCIe-powered
Length
229mm
242mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
2
1-50%
Temp (Load)
70°C-7%
75°C
Perf/Watt
104.9+397%
21.1
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $75, while the FirePro V7000 launched at $899 and now averages $100. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 25% less ($25 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 31.6 (FirePro V7000) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 232% better value. The GeForce GTX 1650 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2012).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650FirePro V7000
MSRP
$149-83%
$899
Avg Price (30d)
$75-25%
$100
Performance per Dollar
104.9+232%
31.6
Codename
TU117
Pitcairn
Release
April 23 2019
August 27 2012
Ranking
#323
#462