GeForce GTX 1650
VS
FirePro W8000

GeForce GTX 1650 vs FirePro W8000

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

2019Core: 1485 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz
VS

FirePro W8000

2012Core: 900 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro W8000

#107
Quadro P6000
MSRP: $5999|Avg: $1500
97%
#108
Quadro M6000
MSRP: $4999|Avg: $500
88%
#245
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
5554%
#260
FirePro W8000
MSRP: $1599|Avg: $1599
100%
#261
Quadro K2000
MSRP: $599|Avg: $500
99%
#262
GRID P4-8Q
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $200
99%
#264
FirePro 3D V5800
MSRP: $479|Avg: $30
97%
#265
GRID P40-8Q
MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150
94%
#266
GRID M3-3020
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $50
94%
#267
GRID M40
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $100
94%
#268
FirePro V3800
MSRP: $129|Avg: $12
94%
#269
FirePro V5800
MSRP: $479|Avg: $15
93%
#270
FirePro 3D V7800
MSRP: $759|Avg: $40
92%
#271
FirePro S9050
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1825
92%
#272
FirePro R5000
MSRP: $1099|Avg: $150
91%
#273
GRID M6-8Q
MSRP: $1500|Avg: $100
89%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce GTX 1650 is significantly newer (2019 vs 2012). The GeForce GTX 1650 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The FirePro W8000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 84.8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the FirePro W8000.

InsightGeForce GTX 1650FirePro W8000
Performance
Leading raw performance (+84.8%)
Lower raw frame rates (-84.8%)
Longevity
Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly
Standard Size (279mm)

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $75 versus $1,599 for the FirePro W8000, it costs 95% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 3839.1% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightGeForce GTX 1650FirePro W8000
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+3839.1%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($75)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,599)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and FirePro W8000

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

AMD

FirePro W8000

The FirePro W8000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 14 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,259 points. Launch price was $1,599.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the FirePro W8000's 4,259 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 84.8%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the FirePro W8000 uses GCN 1.0, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1,792 (FirePro W8000). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 3.226 TFLOPS (FirePro W8000).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650FirePro W8000
G3D Mark Score
7,869+85%
4,259
Architecture
Turing
GCN 1.0
Process Node
12 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
896
1792+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.984 TFLOPS
3.226 TFLOPS+8%
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
56
112+100%
L1 Cache
896 KB+100%
448 KB
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
0.5 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650FirePro W8000
Upscaling Tech
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 0.5 MB (FirePro W8000) — the GeForce GTX 1650 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650FirePro W8000
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
0.5 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12 (FirePro W8000). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 6.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650FirePro W8000
DirectX
12
12
Vulkan
1.4+17%
1.2
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
3
6+100%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs VCE 1.0 (FirePro W8000). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs UVD 3.2. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro W8000).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650FirePro W8000
Encoder
NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
VCE 1.0
Decoder
NVDEC 4th gen
UVD 3.2
Codecs
H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the FirePro W8000's 225W — a 100% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (FirePro W8000). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 279mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 58°C.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650FirePro W8000
TDP
75W-67%
225W
Recommended PSU
300W-14%
350W
Power Connector
None
PCIe-powered
Length
229mm
279mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
70°C
58°C-17%
Perf/Watt
104.9+455%
18.9
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $75, while the FirePro W8000 launched at $1599 and now averages $1599. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 95.3% less ($1524 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2.7 (FirePro W8000) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 3785.2% better value. The GeForce GTX 1650 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2012).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650FirePro W8000
MSRP
$149-91%
$1599
Avg Price (30d)
$75-95%
$1599
Performance per Dollar
104.9+3785%
2.7
Codename
TU117
Tahiti
Release
April 23 2019
June 14 2012
Ranking
#323
#481