GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce 510

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 510

#582

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

3705%

#584

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

3359%

#585

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

3350%

#589

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

3046%

#590

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

3026%

#592

GeForce 510

MSRP: $99|Avg: $15

100%

#593

Mobility Radeon HD 3650

MSRP: $49|Avg: $15

98%

#595

GeForce 9300M G

MSRP: $30|Avg: $30

97%

#596

GeForce 9800 GT

MSRP: $160|Avg: $20

96%

#598

GeForce 9100M G

MSRP: $30|Avg: $10

95%

#599

Mobility Radeon X1900

MSRP: $49|Avg: $15

94%

#600

GeForce 210

MSRP: $50|Avg: $5

94%

#601

Mobility Radeon HD 4330

MSRP: $49|Avg: $49

94%

#602

Radeon R7 M365X

MSRP: $300|Avg: $300

94%

#603

Mobility Radeon HD 5870

MSRP: $399|Avg: $50

93%

#604

Radeon R7 M260DX

MSRP: $300|Avg: $300

93%

#605

Radeon HD 8610G

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

91%

#606

Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8750M Dual

MSRP: $250|Avg: $60

89%

#607

Radeon HD 4650 AGP

MSRP: $80|Avg: $20

89%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2613.4% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 510.

Insight	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce 510
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+2613.4%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-2613.4%)
Longevity	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)	Ampere (2020−2025) (8nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $75 (vs $15), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 442.7% better value per dollar than the GeForce 510.

Insight	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce 510
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+442.7%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($75)	✅More affordable ($15)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

GeForce 510 Benchmark Check

Loading...

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and GeForce 510

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

GeForce 510

The GeForce 510 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in Maio 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 832 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 290 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the GeForce 510's 290 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 2613.4%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the GeForce 510 uses Ampere, both on 12 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2,048 (GeForce 510). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 4.731 TFLOPS (GeForce 510). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1155 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce 510
G3D Mark Score	7,869+2613%	290
Architecture	Turing	Ampere
Process Node	12 nm	8 nm
Shading Units	896	2048+129%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS	4.731 TFLOPS+59%
Boost Clock	1665 MHz+44%	1155 MHz
ROPs	32	40+25%
TMUs	56	64+14%
L1 Cache	0.88 MB	2 MB+127%
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce 510
Upscaling Tech	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	FSR 3 (Compatible)	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce 510 has 2 GB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2 MB (GeForce 510) — the GeForce 510 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce 510
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	128 GB/s	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 11.0 (GeForce 510). Vulkan: 1.4 vs None. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce 510
DirectX	12+9%	11.0
Vulkan	1.4	None
OpenGL	4.6+12%	4.1
Max Displays	3+50%	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs No (GeForce 510). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs PureVideo HD VP4. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce 510).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce 510
Encoder	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)	No
Decoder	NVDEC 4th gen	PureVideo HD VP4
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the GeForce 510's 25W — a 100% difference. The GeForce 510 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (GeForce 510). Power connectors: None vs Legacy. Card length: 229mm vs 168mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 70°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce 510
TDP	75W	25W-67%
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	Legacy
Length	229mm	168mm
Height	111mm	64mm
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	70°C	70°C
Perf/Watt	104.9+804%	11.6

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $75, while the GeForce 510 launched at $99 and now averages $15. The GeForce 510 costs 80% less ($60 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 19.3 (GeForce 510) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 443.5% better value. The GeForce 510 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2019).