GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce 810A

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 810A

#423

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

1658%

#425

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

1503%

#426

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

1499%

#430

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

1363%

#431

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

1353%

#433

GeForce 810A

MSRP: $100|Avg: $20

100%

#434

GeForce GT 520MX

MSRP: $45|Avg: $10

99%

#435

Radeon R5 330

MSRP: $81|Avg: $45

99%

#437

Radeon HD 8450G + 8750M Dual

MSRP: $100|Avg: $100

97%

#438

Radeon R3

MSRP: $50|Avg: $50

96%

#439

Radeon HD 7520G + HD 8600/8700M Dual

MSRP: $100|Avg: $100

95%

#441

Radeon HD 8550G + 8600M Dual

MSRP: $100|Avg: $100

94%

#443

Radeon R9 M360

MSRP: $300|Avg: $81

93%

#444

Radeon HD 8550G + 7600M Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $50

92%

#445

Radeon R9 M365X

MSRP: $250|Avg: $50

91%

#446

GeForce 7800 GS

MSRP: $30|Avg: $30

90%

#447

Radeon HD 8650G + 7670M Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

90%

#448

Radeon R9 M265X

MSRP: $200|Avg: $30

89%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce GTX 1650 uses modern memory architecture. The GeForce GTX 1650 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce 810A lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1101.4% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (4 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 810A.

Insight	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce 810A
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+1101.4%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1101.4%)
Longevity	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+700%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	—

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $75 (vs $20), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 220.4% better value per dollar than the GeForce 810A.

Insight	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce 810A
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+220.4%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($75)	✅More affordable ($20)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

GeForce 810A Benchmark Check

Loading...

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and GeForce 810A

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

GeForce 810A

The GeForce 810A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 655 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the GeForce 810A's 655 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 1101.4%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the GeForce 810A uses Maxwell, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 256 (GeForce 810A). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 0.5888 TFLOPS (GeForce 810A). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1150 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce 810A
G3D Mark Score	7,869+1101%	655
Architecture	Turing	Maxwell
Process Node	12 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	896+250%	256
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS+407%	0.5888 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1665 MHz+45%	1150 MHz
ROPs	32+300%	8
TMUs	56+250%	16
L1 Cache	896 KB+600%	128 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce 810A
Upscaling Tech	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	FSR 3 (Compatible)	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce 810A has 512 MB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce 810A
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+700%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	128 GB/s	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 11.0 (GeForce 810A). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 1.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce 810A
DirectX	12+9%	11.0
Vulkan	1.4+27%	1.1
OpenGL	4.6+2%	4.5
Max Displays	3+200%	1

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs No (GeForce 810A). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs PureVideo HD VP5. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 (GeForce 810A).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce 810A
Encoder	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)	No
Decoder	NVDEC 4th gen	PureVideo HD VP5
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the GeForce 810A's 33W — a 77.8% difference. The GeForce 810A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (GeForce 810A). Power connectors: None vs Legacy. Card length: 229mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 70°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce 810A
TDP	75W	33W-56%
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	Legacy
Length	229mm	0mm
Height	111mm	0mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	70°C	70°C
Perf/Watt	104.9+430%	19.8

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $75, while the GeForce 810A launched at $100 and now averages $20. The GeForce 810A costs 73.3% less ($55 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 32.8 (GeForce 810A) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 219.8% better value. The GeForce GTX 1650 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2014).