GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce FX 5500

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce FX 5500

#726

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

49350%

#728

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

44736%

#729

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

44618%

#733

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

40573%

#734

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

40295%

#736

GeForce FX 5500

MSRP: $37|Avg: $30

100%

#737

RADEON 9500

MSRP: $179|Avg: $30

91%

#738

MOBILITY RADEON 9800

MSRP: $229|Avg: $25

91%

#739

RADEON X850 XT

MSRP: $499|Avg: $50

73%

#740

RADEON 9800

MSRP: $399|Avg: $399

68%

#742

RADEON 9000

MSRP: $49|Avg: $20

45%

#743

RADEON 9200 SE

MSRP: $30|Avg: $15

45%

#744

MOBILITY RADEON 7500

MSRP: $49|Avg: $15

36%

#745

MOBILITY RADEON 9200

MSRP: $49|Avg: $15

27%

#746

MOBILITY RADEON 9000

MSRP: $50|Avg: $5

27%

#747

GeForce4 MX 420

MSRP: $99|Avg: $10

23%

#748

RADEON 9250

MSRP: $79|Avg: $25

18%

#749

RADEON 9200

MSRP: $99|Avg: $25

18%

#750

GeForce 256

MSRP: $199|Avg: $20

14%

#751

GeForce4 MX 440

MSRP: $149|Avg: $49

14%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 98262.5% higher G3D Mark score and 1500% more VRAM (4 GB vs 256 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce FX 5500.

Insight	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce FX 5500
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+98262.5%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-98262.5%)
Longevity	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+1500%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $75 (vs $30), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 39245% better value per dollar than the GeForce FX 5500.

Insight	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce FX 5500
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+39245%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($75)	✅More affordable ($30)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

GeForce FX 5500 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and GeForce FX 5500

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

GeForce FX 5500

The GeForce FX 5500 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 17 2021. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock ranges from 1065 MHz to 1320 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the GeForce FX 5500's 8 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 98262.5%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the GeForce FX 5500 uses Rankine, both on a 12 nm process. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1,024 (GeForce FX 5500). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2.703 TFLOPS (GeForce FX 5500). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1320 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce FX 5500
G3D Mark Score	7,869+98263%	8
Architecture	Turing	Rankine
Process Node	12 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	896	1024+14%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS+10%	2.703 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1665 MHz+26%	1320 MHz
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	56+75%	32
L1 Cache	0.88 MB	2 MB+127%
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce FX 5500
Upscaling Tech	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	FSR 3 (Compatible)	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce FX 5500 has 256 MB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 1500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2 MB (GeForce FX 5500) — the GeForce FX 5500 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce FX 5500
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+1500%	0.25 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	128 GB/s	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 9.0a (GeForce FX 5500). Vulkan: 1.4 vs None. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 1.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce FX 5500
DirectX	12+33%	9.0a
Vulkan	1.4	None
OpenGL	4.6+207%	1.5
Max Displays	3+50%	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs No (GeForce FX 5500). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs No.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce FX 5500
Encoder	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)	No
Decoder	NVDEC 4th gen	No
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the GeForce FX 5500's 25W — a 100% difference. The GeForce FX 5500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (GeForce FX 5500). Power connectors: None vs Legacy. Card length: 229mm vs 171mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 70°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce FX 5500
TDP	75W	25W-67%
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	Legacy
Length	229mm	171mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	70°C	70°C
Perf/Watt	104.9+34867%	0.3

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $75, while the GeForce FX 5500 launched at $37 and now averages $30. The GeForce FX 5500 costs 60% less ($45 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 0.3 (GeForce FX 5500) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 34866.7% better value. The GeForce FX 5500 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2019).