GeForce GTX 1650
VS
GeForce FX 5700 Ultra

GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce FX 5700 Ultra

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

2019Core: 1485 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce FX 5700 Ultra

2022Core: 832 MHzBoost: 1155 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 23044.1% higher G3D Mark score and 1500% more VRAM (4 GB vs 256 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce FX 5700 Ultra.

InsightGeForce GTX 1650GeForce FX 5700 Ultra
Performance
Leading raw performance (+23044.1%)
Lower raw frame rates (-23044.1%)
Longevity
Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ampere (2020−2025) (8nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+1500%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 1650 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and GeForce FX 5700 Ultra

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

NVIDIA

GeForce FX 5700 Ultra

The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in Maio 2022. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock ranges from 832 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 34 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the GeForce FX 5700 Ultra's 34 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 23044.1%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the GeForce FX 5700 Ultra uses Rankine, both on 12 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2,048 (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 4.731 TFLOPS (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1155 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650GeForce FX 5700 Ultra
G3D Mark Score
7,869+23044%
34
Architecture
Turing
Rankine
Process Node
12 nm
8 nm
Shading Units
896
2048+129%
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.984 TFLOPS
4.731 TFLOPS+59%
Boost Clock
1665 MHz+44%
1155 MHz
ROPs
32
40+25%
TMUs
56
64+14%
L1 Cache
0.88 MB
2 MB+127%
L2 Cache
1 MB
2 MB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650GeForce FX 5700 Ultra
Upscaling Tech
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce FX 5700 Ultra has 256 MB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 1500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2 MB (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) — the GeForce FX 5700 Ultra has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650GeForce FX 5700 Ultra
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+1500%
0.25 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
128 GB/s
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB
2 MB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 9.0a (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650GeForce FX 5700 Ultra
DirectX
12+33%
9.0a
OpenGL
4.6+119%
2.1
Max Displays
3+50%
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs Integrated Decoder ONLY (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs Integrated MPEG-2 Decoder. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs MPEG-2 (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650GeForce FX 5700 Ultra
Encoder
NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
Integrated Decoder ONLY
Decoder
NVDEC 4th gen
Integrated MPEG-2 Decoder
Codecs
H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9
MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the GeForce FX 5700 Ultra's 25W — a 100% difference. The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra). Power connectors: None vs Legacy. Card length: 229mm vs 229mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75°C.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650GeForce FX 5700 Ultra
TDP
75W
25W-67%
Recommended PSU
300W-14%
350W
Power Connector
None
Legacy
Length
229mm
229mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
2
1-50%
Temp (Load)
70°C-7%
75°C
Perf/Watt
104.9+7393%
1.4
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $75, while the GeForce FX 5700 Ultra launched at $0 and now averages $0. The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra costs 100+% less ($75 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs Infinity (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) — the GeForce FX 5700 Ultra offers Infinity% better value. The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2019).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650GeForce FX 5700 Ultra
MSRP
$149
$0-100%
Avg Price (30d)
$75
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
104.9
Infinity
Codename
TU117
GA107
Release
April 23 2019
Maio 2022
Ranking
#323
#387