GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce FX 5700LE

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce FX 5700LE

#1

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

MSRP: $399|Avg: $280

29016%

#2

GeForce RTX 5060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

27876%

#3

Radeon RX 5600 XT

MSRP: $279|Avg: $180

27552%

#4

Radeon RX 9060

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

27504%

#5

GeForce RTX 5050

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

27448%

#6

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

MSRP: $249|Avg: $150

27292%

#7

Arc A580

MSRP: $179|Avg: $179

26948%

#8

Radeon RX 9060 XT

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

26848%

#9

Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

26600%

#10

Radeon RX 7600

MSRP: $269|Avg: $250

26528%

#11

Radeon RX 6600

MSRP: $329|Avg: $180

26208%

#12

GeForce RTX 4060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

26152%

#13

Arc B570

MSRP: $219|Avg: $219

25680%

#14

Arc B580

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

25664%

#348

Radeon R5 430 OEM

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13

32000%

#363

Radeon X1600

MSRP: $199|Avg: $49

100%

#364

GeForce FX 5700LE

MSRP: $100|Avg: $10

100%

#365

GeForce PCX 5750

MSRP: $150|Avg: $15

92%

#366

GeForce FX 5700

MSRP: $199|Avg: $15

84%

#367

RADEON X800 XT

MSRP: $499|Avg: $20

80%

#368

RADEON X800 XL

MSRP: $349|Avg: $15

80%

#369

RADEON 9600 XT

MSRP: $199|Avg: $15

72%

#370

RADEON X800 PRO

MSRP: $399|Avg: $15

64%

#371

GeForce FX 5200LE

MSRP: $43|Avg: $25

64%

#372

GeForce FX 5200SE

MSRP: $99|Avg: $10

48%

#373

RADEON 9800 XT

MSRP: $499|Avg: $30

44%

#374

GeForce FX 5200

MSRP: $70|Avg: $25

44%

#375

GeForce PCX 5300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $15

40%

#376

GeForce FX 5900

MSRP: $399|Avg: $20

36%

#377

GeForce FX 5600 Ultra

MSRP: $199|Avg: $20

36%

#378

GeForce FX 5100

MSRP: $100|Avg: $10

32%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce GTX 1650 is significantly newer (2019 vs 2010). The GeForce GTX 1650 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce FX 5700LE lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 31376% higher G3D Mark score and 1500% more VRAM (4 GB vs 256 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce FX 5700LE.

Insight	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce FX 5700LE
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+31376%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-31376%)
Longevity	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+1500%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	—

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $75 (vs $10), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 4096.8% better value per dollar than the GeForce FX 5700LE.

Insight	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce FX 5700LE
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+4096.8%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($75)	✅More affordable ($10)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

GeForce FX 5700LE Benchmark Check

Loading...

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and GeForce FX 5700LE

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

GeForce FX 5700LE

The GeForce FX 5700LE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 7 2010. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock speed is 732 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 219W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 25 points. Launch price was $349.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the GeForce FX 5700LE's 25 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 31376%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the GeForce FX 5700LE uses Rankine, both on 12 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 480 (GeForce FX 5700LE). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1.405 TFLOPS (GeForce FX 5700LE).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce FX 5700LE
G3D Mark Score	7,869+31376%	25
Architecture	Turing	Rankine
Process Node	12 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	896+87%	480
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS+112%	1.405 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	40+25%
TMUs	56	60+7%
L1 Cache	896 KB	960 KB+7%
L2 Cache	1 MB+59%	0.63 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce FX 5700LE
Upscaling Tech	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	FSR 3 (Compatible)	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce FX 5700LE has 256 MB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 1500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 0.63 MB (GeForce FX 5700LE) — the GeForce GTX 1650 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce FX 5700LE
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+1500%	0.25 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	128 GB/s	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB+59%	0.63 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 9.0a (GeForce FX 5700LE). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 1.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 1.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce FX 5700LE
DirectX	12+33%	9.0a
OpenGL	4.6+207%	1.5
Max Displays	3+200%	1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the GeForce FX 5700LE's 219W — a 98% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (GeForce FX 5700LE). Power connectors: None vs Legacy.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce FX 5700LE
TDP	75W-66%	219W
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	Legacy
Length	229mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	70°C	—
Perf/Watt	104.9+104800%	0.1

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $75, while the GeForce FX 5700LE launched at $100 and now averages $10. The GeForce FX 5700LE costs 86.7% less ($65 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2.5 (GeForce FX 5700LE) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 4096% better value. The GeForce GTX 1650 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2010).