GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce G105M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce G105M

#1

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

MSRP: $399|Avg: $280

818%

#2

GeForce RTX 5060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

786%

#3

Radeon RX 5600 XT

MSRP: $279|Avg: $180

777%

#4

Radeon RX 9060

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

775%

#5

GeForce RTX 5050

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

774%

#6

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

MSRP: $249|Avg: $150

769%

#7

Arc A580

MSRP: $179|Avg: $179

760%

#8

Radeon RX 9060 XT

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

757%

#9

Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

750%

#10

Radeon RX 7600

MSRP: $269|Avg: $250

748%

#11

Radeon RX 6600

MSRP: $329|Avg: $180

739%

#12

GeForce RTX 4060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

737%

#13

Arc B570

MSRP: $219|Avg: $219

724%

#14

Arc B580

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

723%

#87

Radeon RX 7500

MSRP: $229|Avg: $229

92%

#88

Radeon Ryzen 5 5500H

MSRP: $250|Avg: $250

91%

#129

Radeon R5 430 OEM

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13

902%

#144

GeForce G105M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#145

Radeon HD 8330E

MSRP: $30|Avg: $5

98%

#146

Radeon HD 8670D

MSRP: $60|Avg: $15

97%

#147

Radeon R7 A370

MSRP: $149|Avg: $51

97%

#148

Radeon HD 5770

MSRP: $159|Avg: $159

96%

#149

Radeon HD 4770

MSRP: $109|Avg: $109

94%

#150

Radeon HD 8510G

MSRP: $45|Avg: $5

93%

#151

Radeon HD 8550G

MSRP: $50|Avg: $50

93%

#153

GeForce GT 635

MSRP: $99|Avg: $20

92%

#154

Radeon R7 A8-7500

MSRP: $100|Avg: $50

91%

#155

Radeon HD 5670

MSRP: $99|Avg: $15

91%

#157

GeForce GT 740A

MSRP: $89|Avg: $20

90%

#158

Radeon HD 7420G

MSRP: $40|Avg: $5

89%

#159

Radeon HD 7500G

MSRP: $40|Avg: $5

89%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce GTX 1650 uses modern memory architecture. The GeForce GTX 1650 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce G105M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 5816.5% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (4 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce G105M.

Insight	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce G105M
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+5816.5%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-5816.5%)
Longevity	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+700%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 1650 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

GeForce G105M Benchmark Check

Loading...

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and GeForce G105M

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

GeForce G105M

The GeForce G105M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 25 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1290 MHz to 1392 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 60W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 133 points. Launch price was $109.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the GeForce G105M's 133 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 5816.5%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the GeForce G105M uses Pascal, both on 12 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 640 (GeForce G105M). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1.862 TFLOPS (GeForce G105M). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1392 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce G105M
G3D Mark Score	7,869+5817%	133
Architecture	Turing	Pascal
Process Node	12 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	896+40%	640
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS+60%	1.862 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1665 MHz+20%	1392 MHz
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	56+40%	40
L1 Cache	896 KB+273%	240 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce G105M
Upscaling Tech	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	FSR 3 (Compatible)	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce G105M has 512 MB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce G105M
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+700%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	128 GB/s	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 10.1 (GeForce G105M). Vulkan: 1.4 vs None. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 1.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce G105M
DirectX	12+19%	10.1
Vulkan	1.4	None
OpenGL	4.6+39%	3.3
Max Displays	3+200%	1

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs No (GeForce G105M). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs PureVideo HD VP3. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce G105M).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce G105M
Encoder	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)	No
Decoder	NVDEC 4th gen	PureVideo HD VP3
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the GeForce G105M's 60W — a 22.2% difference. The GeForce G105M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (GeForce G105M). Power connectors: None vs Legacy. Card length: 229mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 70°C.