GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce Go 7200

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce Go 7200

#1

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

MSRP: $399|Avg: $280

3224%

#2

GeForce RTX 5060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

3097%

#3

Radeon RX 5600 XT

MSRP: $279|Avg: $180

3061%

#4

Radeon RX 9060

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

3056%

#5

GeForce RTX 5050

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

3050%

#6

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

MSRP: $249|Avg: $150

3032%

#7

Arc A580

MSRP: $179|Avg: $179

2994%

#8

Radeon RX 9060 XT

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

2983%

#9

Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

2956%

#10

Radeon RX 7600

MSRP: $269|Avg: $250

2948%

#11

Radeon RX 6600

MSRP: $329|Avg: $180

2912%

#12

GeForce RTX 4060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

2906%

#13

Arc B570

MSRP: $219|Avg: $219

2853%

#14

Arc B580

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

2852%

#292

Radeon R5 430 OEM

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13

3556%

#307

GeForce Go 7200

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#308

Radeon HD 3850

MSRP: $179|Avg: $179

100%

#309

Radeon HD 4200

MSRP: $50|Avg: $10

100%

#310

Radeon HD 4270

MSRP: $50|Avg: $10

98%

#312

Radeon E6460

MSRP: $150|Avg: $40

96%

#313

Radeon HD 6290

MSRP: $50|Avg: $50

93%

#314

GeForce GTX 280

MSRP: $649|Avg: $649

88%

#315

Radeon HD 3470

MSRP: $60|Avg: $15

87%

#316

Radeon HD 3000

MSRP: $50|Avg: $10

85%

#317

Radeon HD 6250

MSRP: $50|Avg: $50

84%

#318

GeForce GT 120

MSRP: $100|Avg: $40

84%

#319

GeForce 6600 LE

MSRP: $30|Avg: $30

76%

#320

Radeon HD 3670

MSRP: $100|Avg: $15

75%

#321

Radeon HD 3200

MSRP: $50|Avg: $10

73%

#322

Radeon HD 2350

MSRP: $50|Avg: $48

68%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce GTX 1650 uses modern memory architecture. The GeForce GTX 1650 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce Go 7200 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 17386.7% higher G3D Mark score and 6249.2% more VRAM (4 GB vs 65 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce Go 7200.

Insight	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce Go 7200
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+17386.7%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-17386.7%)
Longevity	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+6249.2%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 1650 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

GeForce Go 7200 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and GeForce Go 7200

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

GeForce Go 7200

The GeForce Go 7200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 29 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 993 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 64W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 45 points. Launch price was $89.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the GeForce Go 7200's 45 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 17386.7%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the GeForce Go 7200 uses Kepler, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 384 (GeForce Go 7200). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 0.7626 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 7200).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce Go 7200
G3D Mark Score	7,869+17387%	45
Architecture	Turing	Kepler
Process Node	12 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	896+133%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS+291%	0.7626 TFLOPS
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	56+75%	32
L1 Cache	896 KB+2700%	32 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce Go 7200
Upscaling Tech	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	FSR 3 (Compatible)	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce Go 7200 has 65 MB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 6249.2% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 0.25 MB (GeForce Go 7200) — the GeForce GTX 1650 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce Go 7200
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+6249%	0.063 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	128 GB/s	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	0.25 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 9.0c (GeForce Go 7200). Vulkan: 1.4 vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 1.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce Go 7200
DirectX	12+33%	9.0c
Vulkan	1.4	N/A
OpenGL	4.6+119%	2.1
Max Displays	3+200%	1

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs None (GeForce Go 7200). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs PureVideo. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs MPEG-2,WMV9,H.264 (GeForce Go 7200).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce Go 7200
Encoder	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)	None
Decoder	NVDEC 4th gen	PureVideo
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9	MPEG-2,WMV9,H.264

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the GeForce Go 7200's 64W — a 15.8% difference. The GeForce Go 7200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (GeForce Go 7200). Power connectors: None vs Legacy. Card length: 229mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce Go 7200
TDP	75W	64W-15%
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	Legacy
Length	229mm	0mm
Height	111mm	0mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	70°C-13%	80
Perf/Watt	104.9+14886%	0.7