GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce Go 7800 GTX

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce Go 7800 GTX

#1

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

MSRP: $399|Avg: $280

1036%

#2

GeForce RTX 5060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

996%

#3

Radeon RX 5600 XT

MSRP: $279|Avg: $180

984%

#4

Radeon RX 9060

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

982%

#5

GeForce RTX 5050

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

980%

#6

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

MSRP: $249|Avg: $150

975%

#7

Arc A580

MSRP: $179|Avg: $179

962%

#8

Radeon RX 9060 XT

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

959%

#9

Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

950%

#10

Radeon RX 7600

MSRP: $269|Avg: $250

947%

#11

Radeon RX 6600

MSRP: $329|Avg: $180

936%

#12

GeForce RTX 4060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

934%

#13

Arc B570

MSRP: $219|Avg: $219

917%

#14

Arc B580

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

917%

#93

Radeon Ryzen 5 5600U

MSRP: $300|Avg: $300

100%

#94

Radeon Ryzen 5 5600H

MSRP: $350|Avg: $350

97%

#95

Radeon Ryzen 5 5500U

MSRP: $300|Avg: $300

96%

#164

Radeon R5 430 OEM

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13

1143%

#179

GeForce Go 7800 GTX

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#181

Radeon HD 8310E

MSRP: $50|Avg: $50

97%

#183

GeForce GT 610

MSRP: $49|Avg: $49

97%

#185

Radeon HD 6530D

MSRP: $50|Avg: $10

96%

#186

Radeon HD 8450G

MSRP: $50|Avg: $50

95%

#187

Radeon HD 4830

MSRP: $130|Avg: $20

95%

#188

GeForce GT 140

MSRP: $99|Avg: $15

95%

#189

GeForce GT 530

MSRP: $100|Avg: $20

95%

#190

GeForce GT 620

MSRP: $59|Avg: $20

94%

#191

Radeon R7 A8-7600

MSRP: $119|Avg: $25

93%

#192

GeForce GTS 240

MSRP: $80|Avg: $40

92%

#193

RADEON HD6370D

MSRP: $50|Avg: $10

91%

#194

Radeon HD 7310

MSRP: $20|Avg: $5

91%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce GTX 1650 is significantly newer (2019 vs 2013). The GeForce GTX 1650 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce Go 7800 GTX lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3647.1% higher G3D Mark score and 1500% more VRAM (4 GB vs 256 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce Go 7800 GTX.

Insight	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce Go 7800 GTX
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+3647.1%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-3647.1%)
Longevity	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+1500%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 1650 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

GeForce Go 7800 GTX Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and GeForce Go 7800 GTX

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

GeForce Go 7800 GTX

The GeForce Go 7800 GTX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 7 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 875 MHz to 928 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 210 points. Launch price was $699.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the GeForce Go 7800 GTX's 210 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 3647.1%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the GeForce Go 7800 GTX uses Kepler, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2,880 (GeForce Go 7800 GTX). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 5.345 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 7800 GTX). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 928 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce Go 7800 GTX
G3D Mark Score	7,869+3647%	210
Architecture	Turing	Kepler
Process Node	12 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	896	2880+221%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS	5.345 TFLOPS+79%
Boost Clock	1665 MHz+79%	928 MHz
ROPs	32	48+50%
TMUs	56	240+329%
L1 Cache	896 KB+273%	240 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB	1.5 MB+50%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce Go 7800 GTX
Upscaling Tech	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	FSR 3 (Compatible)	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce Go 7800 GTX has 256 MB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 1500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1.5 MB (GeForce Go 7800 GTX) — the GeForce Go 7800 GTX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce Go 7800 GTX
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+1500%	0.25 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	128 GB/s	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB	1.5 MB+50%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 9.0c (GeForce Go 7800 GTX). Vulkan: 1.4 vs None. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce Go 7800 GTX
DirectX	12+33%	9.0c
Vulkan	1.4	None
OpenGL	4.6+119%	2.1
Max Displays	3+50%	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs No (GeForce Go 7800 GTX). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs PureVideo. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs MPEG-2,WMV9,H.264 (GeForce Go 7800 GTX).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce Go 7800 GTX
Encoder	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)	No
Decoder	NVDEC 4th gen	PureVideo
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9	MPEG-2,WMV9,H.264

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the GeForce Go 7800 GTX's 250W — a 107.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (GeForce Go 7800 GTX). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 85°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce Go 7800 GTX
TDP	75W-70%	250W
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	229mm	0mm
Height	111mm	0mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	70°C-18%	85°C
Perf/Watt	104.9+13013%	0.8