GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce GT 630

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 630

#1

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

MSRP: $399|Avg: $280

731%

#2

GeForce RTX 5060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

702%

#3

Radeon RX 5600 XT

MSRP: $279|Avg: $180

694%

#4

Radeon RX 9060

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

692%

#5

GeForce RTX 5050

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

691%

#6

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

MSRP: $249|Avg: $150

687%

#7

Arc A580

MSRP: $179|Avg: $179

678%

#8

Radeon RX 9060 XT

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

676%

#9

Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

670%

#10

Radeon RX 7600

MSRP: $269|Avg: $250

668%

#11

Radeon RX 6600

MSRP: $329|Avg: $180

660%

#12

GeForce RTX 4060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

658%

#13

Arc B570

MSRP: $219|Avg: $219

647%

#14

Arc B580

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

646%

#84

Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H

MSRP: $350|Avg: $350

99%

#85

Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U

MSRP: $450|Avg: $450

95%

#86

Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U

MSRP: $350|Avg: $350

92%

#111

Radeon R5 430 OEM

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13

806%

#126

GeForce GT 630

MSRP: $69|Avg: $20

100%

#128

Radeon HD 6770

MSRP: $129|Avg: $129

99%

#129

GeForce GT 440

MSRP: $79|Avg: $40

98%

#130

Radeon R7 340

MSRP: $99|Avg: $25

98%

#133

Radeon HD 6750

MSRP: $109|Avg: $109

97%

#135

Radeon R5 240

MSRP: $59|Avg: $10

95%

#136

Radeon HD 8570

MSRP: $100|Avg: $20

95%

#137

Radeon R5 340

MSRP: $99|Avg: $25

95%

#139

GeForce GT 730

MSRP: $89|Avg: $45

93%

#140

Radeon HD 8400E

MSRP: $30|Avg: $5

93%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1048.8% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GT 630.

Insight	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce GT 630
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+1048.8%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1048.8%)
Longevity	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $75 (vs $20), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 206.3% better value per dollar than the GeForce GT 630.

Insight	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce GT 630
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+206.3%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($75)	✅More affordable ($20)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

GeForce GT 630 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and GeForce GT 630

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

GeForce GT 630

The GeForce GT 630 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2022. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1740 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 685 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the GeForce GT 630's 685 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 1048.8%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the GeForce GT 630 uses Turing, both on a 12 nm process. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 512 (GeForce GT 630). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1.828 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 630). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1785 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce GT 630
G3D Mark Score	7,869+1049%	685
Architecture	Turing	Turing
Process Node	12 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	896+75%	512
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS+63%	1.828 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1665 MHz	1785 MHz+7%
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	56+75%	32
L1 Cache	896 KB+75%	512 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce GT 630
Upscaling Tech	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	FSR 3 (Compatible)	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 630 has 2 GB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce GT 630
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	128 GB/s	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GT 630). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.0. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce GT 630
DirectX	12	12 (11_0)
Vulkan	1.4+40%	1.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3+50%	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs None (GeForce GT 630). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs PureVideo HD (VP5). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GT 630).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce GT 630
Encoder	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)	None
Decoder	NVDEC 4th gen	PureVideo HD (VP5)
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the GeForce GT 630's 75W — a 0% difference. The GeForce GT 630 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 300W (GeForce GT 630). Power connectors: None vs None. Card length: 229mm vs 145mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 78.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce GT 630
TDP	75W	75W
Recommended PSU	300W	300W
Power Connector	None	None
Length	229mm	145mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	70°C-10%	78
Perf/Watt	104.9+1053%	9.1

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $75, while the GeForce GT 630 launched at $69 and now averages $20. The GeForce GT 630 costs 73.3% less ($55 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 34.3 (GeForce GT 630) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 205.8% better value. The GeForce GT 630 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2019).