
GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

GeForce GTX 1650
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Why is GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER better than GeForce GTX 1650?
The matchup between the classic budget-friendly GeForce GTX 1650 and its successor, the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER, reveals the significant performance jump offered by refinements in the Turing architecture. The SUPER variant is roughly 30-40% faster in 1080p gaming benchmarks, moving from an entry-level experience to a much more stable e-sports and casual AAA card. This is one of the most effective mid-cycle upgrades in budget GPU history.
Technically, the GTX 1650 SUPER features faster GDDR6 memory and a more efficient core structure compared to the standard GDDR5 found on most 1650 models. While both cards feature a 4GB VRAM buffer, the SUPER's improved bandwidth allows it to handle modern shaders with much better stability. It also includes an improved NVENC encoder, making it a better choice for budget streamers and content creators. For anyone on a tight budget, the jump in speed and features makes the SUPER version a more modern and reliable choice.
The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is the definitive winner in this comparison, providing a level of speed and reliability that elevates the 1080p gaming experience. it is the superior choice for budget systems. The GeForce GTX 1650 remains a winner for its legendary power efficiency, as it often does not require an external power connector, making it a great choice for upgrading office PCs. For most players looking for the best performance per dollar, the jump to the SUPER variant is the more sensible and powerful choice.
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 29.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1650.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-29.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+29.4%) |
| Longevity | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (4 GB) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $81 (vs $75), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 19.9% better value per dollar than the GeForce GTX 1650.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+19.9%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($75) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($81) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 22 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1530 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,186 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER's 10,186 — the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER leads by 29.4%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER uses Turing, both on a 12 nm process. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1,280 (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 4.416 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1725 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,869 | 10,186+29% |
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 896 | 1280+43% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.984 TFLOPS | 4.416 TFLOPS+48% |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz | 1725 MHz+4% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 56 | 80+43% |
| L1 Cache | 0.88 MB | 1.3 MB+48% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) — a 50% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 128 GB/s | 192 GB/s+50% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 7th Gen NVENC (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5th gen (Volta) | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th gen | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER's 100W — a 28.6% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER). Power connectors: None vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 229mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-25% | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 229mm | 229mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-7% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 104.9+3% | 101.9 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $75, while the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER launched at $159 and now averages $81. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 7.4% less ($6 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 125.8 (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) — the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER offers 19.9% better value.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149-6% | $159 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $75-7% | $81 |
| Performance per Dollar | 104.9 | 125.8+20% |
| Codename | TU117 | TU116 |
| Release | April 23 2019 | November 22 2019 |
| Ranking | #323 | #258 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















