GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce GTX 285M SLI

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 285M SLI

#399

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

1479%

#401

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

1341%

#402

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

1337%

#406

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

1216%

#407

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

1208%

#409

GeForce GTX 285M SLI

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $40

100%

#410

Radeon R7 M260X

MSRP: $139|Avg: $35

99%

#411

Radeon HD 8570D + HD 6570 Dual

MSRP: $120|Avg: $25

99%

#412

Intel UHD Graphics 615

MSRP: $100|Avg: $50

98%

#413

Radeon R7 A365

MSRP: $109|Avg: $55

98%

#414

Radeon 3015e

MSRP: $49|Avg: $49

98%

#415

Radeon HD 7620G

MSRP: $50|Avg: $10

97%

#416

Radeon R9 M390X

MSRP: $550|Avg: $120

96%

#417

Arc 8-Core iGPU

MSRP: $503|Avg: $400

95%

#418

Mobility Radeon HD 4670

MSRP: $67|Avg: $20

94%

#419

Radeon HD 8570D + HD 8570 Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $15

94%

#420

Radeon R9 M385

MSRP: $300|Avg: $60

94%

#421

Radeon R5 235

MSRP: $49|Avg: $49

93%

#422

Radeon R9 M375X

MSRP: $250|Avg: $50

93%

#423

Radeon HD 6620G

MSRP: $50|Avg: $10

93%

#424

Radeon R5 310

MSRP: $49|Avg: $15

92%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce GTX 1650 is significantly newer (2019 vs 2009). The GeForce GTX 1650 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 285M SLI lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 972.1% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (4 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 285M SLI.

Insight	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce GTX 285M SLI
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+972.1%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-972.1%)
Longevity	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / G9x (2007−2010))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+700%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	—

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $75 (vs $40), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 471.8% better value per dollar than the GeForce GTX 285M SLI.

Insight	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce GTX 285M SLI
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+471.8%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($75)	✅More affordable ($40)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 285M SLI Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and GeForce GTX 285M SLI

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

GeForce GTX 285M SLI

The GeForce GTX 285M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 2 2009. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 576 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 734 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the GeForce GTX 285M SLI's 734 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 972.1%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the GeForce GTX 285M SLI uses G9x, both on 12 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 256 (GeForce GTX 285M SLI).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce GTX 285M SLI
G3D Mark Score	7,869+972%	734
Architecture	Turing	G9x
Process Node	12 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	896+250%	256

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce GTX 285M SLI
Upscaling Tech	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	FSR 3 (Compatible)	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 285M SLI has 512 MB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce GTX 285M SLI
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+700%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	128 GB/s	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce GTX 285M SLI). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce GTX 285M SLI
DirectX	12+8%	11.1 (10_0)
OpenGL	4.6+39%	3.3
Max Displays	3+50%	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs PureVideo HD VP2 (GeForce GTX 285M SLI). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs PureVideo HD VP2. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 285M SLI).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce GTX 285M SLI
Encoder	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)	PureVideo HD VP2
Decoder	NVDEC 4th gen	PureVideo HD VP2
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the GeForce GTX 285M SLI's 150W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 285M SLI). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 95°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce GTX 285M SLI
TDP	75W-50%	150W
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	229mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	70°C-26%	95°C
Perf/Watt	104.9+2041%	4.9

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 285M SLI costs 46.7% less ($35 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 18.4 (GeForce GTX 285M SLI) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 470.1% better value. The GeForce GTX 1650 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2009).