GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce GTX 675M SLI

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 675M SLI

#556

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

3280%

#558

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

2973%

#559

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

2966%

#563

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

2697%

#564

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

2678%

#566

GeForce GTX 675M SLI

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#567

Radeon HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

100%

#568

Radeon HD 8650G + HD 7600M Dual

MSRP: $250|Avg: $40

99%

#569

Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8750M Dual

MSRP: $250|Avg: $40

99%

#570

Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8600/8700M Dual

MSRP: $200|Avg: $100

99%

#571

Radeon R5 M315

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

98%

#572

Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3

MSRP: $599|Avg: $300

98%

#573

GeForce 9400 GT

MSRP: $59|Avg: $20

98%

#574

Radeon HD 8610G + HD 8600M Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

97%

#575

GeForce 240M GT

MSRP: $100|Avg: $5

97%

#576

Radeon HD 8450G + HD 8670M Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

96%

#577

GeForce 310

MSRP: $45|Avg: $5

96%

#578

Radeon R5 M320

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

96%

#579

Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8570M Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $40

96%

#580

GeForce 9600 GT

MSRP: $149|Avg: $20

96%

#581

Radeon HD 7620G + HD 8600M Dual

MSRP: $140|Avg: $30

95%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce GTX 1650 is significantly newer (2019 vs 2011). The GeForce GTX 1650 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 675M SLI lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 137.7% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 675M SLI.

Insight	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce GTX 675M SLI
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+137.7%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-137.7%)
Longevity	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi (2010−2014))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 1650 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 675M SLI Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and GeForce GTX 675M SLI

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

GeForce GTX 675M SLI

The GeForce GTX 675M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 6 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 620 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 2W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,311 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the GeForce GTX 675M SLI's 3,311 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 137.7%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the GeForce GTX 675M SLI uses Fermi, both on 12 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 768 (GeForce GTX 675M SLI).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce GTX 675M SLI
G3D Mark Score	7,869+138%	3,311
Architecture	Turing	Fermi
Process Node	12 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	896+17%	768

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce GTX 675M SLI
Upscaling Tech	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	FSR 3 (Compatible)	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 675M SLI has 2 GB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce GTX 675M SLI
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	128 GB/s	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 675M SLI). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.0. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce GTX 675M SLI
DirectX	12	12 (11_0)
Vulkan	1.4+17%	1.2
OpenGL	4.6+15%	4.0
Max Displays	3+50%	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTX 675M SLI). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs PureVideo HD VP4. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 675M SLI).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce GTX 675M SLI
Encoder	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)	PureVideo HD VP4
Decoder	NVDEC 4th gen	PureVideo HD VP4
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the GeForce GTX 675M SLI's 2W — a 189.6% difference. The GeForce GTX 675M SLI is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 675M SLI). Power connectors: None vs 1x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 92°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce GTX 675M SLI
TDP	75W	2W-97%
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	1x 6-pin
Length	229mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	70°C-24%	92°C
Perf/Watt	104.9	1655.5+1478%