GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce GTX TITAN Black

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce GTX 1650 uses modern memory architecture. The GeForce GTX 1650 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX TITAN Black lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX TITAN Black is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 16.6% higher G3D Mark score and 50% more VRAM (6 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1650.

Insight	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce GTX TITAN Black
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-16.6%)	✅Leading raw performance (+16.6%)
Longevity	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+50%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	Standard Size (267mm)

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $75 versus $120 for the GeForce GTX TITAN Black, it costs 38% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 37.2% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce GTX TITAN Black
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+37.2%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($75)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($120)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX TITAN Black Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and GeForce GTX TITAN Black

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

GeForce GTX TITAN Black

The GeForce GTX TITAN Black is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 18 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 889 MHz to 980 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,177 points. Launch price was $999.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the GeForce GTX TITAN Black's 9,177 — the GeForce GTX TITAN Black leads by 16.6%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the GeForce GTX TITAN Black uses Kepler, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2,880 (GeForce GTX TITAN Black). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 5.645 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX TITAN Black). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 980 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce GTX TITAN Black
G3D Mark Score	7,869	9,177+17%
Architecture	Turing	Kepler
Process Node	12 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	896	2880+221%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS	5.645 TFLOPS+89%
Boost Clock	1665 MHz+70%	980 MHz
ROPs	32	48+50%
TMUs	56	240+329%
L1 Cache	896 KB+273%	240 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB	1.5 MB+50%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce GTX TITAN Black
Upscaling Tech	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	FSR 3 (Compatible)	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX TITAN Black has 6 GB. The GeForce GTX TITAN Black offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 336 GB/s (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) — a 162.5% advantage for the GeForce GTX TITAN Black. Bus width: 128-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) — the GeForce GTX TITAN Black has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce GTX TITAN Black
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	6 GB+50%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	128 GB/s	336 GB/s+163%
Bus Width	128-bit	384-bit+200%
L2 Cache	1 MB	1.5 MB+50%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12.0 (GeForce GTX TITAN Black). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce GTX TITAN Black
DirectX	12	12.0
Vulkan	1.4+17%	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3	4+33%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs NVENC 1.0 (GeForce GTX TITAN Black). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs PureVideo HD VP5. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs MPEG-2,H.264 (GeForce GTX TITAN Black).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce GTX TITAN Black
Encoder	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)	NVENC 1.0
Decoder	NVDEC 4th gen	PureVideo HD VP5
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the GeForce GTX TITAN Black's 250W — a 107.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 600W (GeForce GTX TITAN Black). Power connectors: None vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce GTX TITAN Black
TDP	75W-70%	250W
Recommended PSU	300W-50%	600W
Power Connector	None	6-pin + 8-pin
Length	229mm	267mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	70°C-13%	80°C
Perf/Watt	104.9+186%	36.7

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $75, while the GeForce GTX TITAN Black launched at $999 and now averages $120. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 37.5% less ($45 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 76.5 (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 37.1% better value. The GeForce GTX 1650 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2014).