GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce RTX 2080 Ti

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 173.4% higher G3D Mark score and 175% more VRAM (11 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1650.

Insight	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-173.4%)	✅Leading raw performance (+173.4%)
Longevity	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Turing (2018−2022))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+175%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	Standard Size (267mm)

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $75 versus $600 for the GeForce RTX 2080 Ti, it costs 88% less. While it maintains significantly lower raw performance, this results in a 192.6% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+192.6%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($75)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($600)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Benchmark Check

Loading...

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and GeForce RTX 2080 Ti

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

GeForce RTX 2080 Ti

The GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 20 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1350 MHz to 1545 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 68 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 21,513 points. Launch price was $999.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the GeForce RTX 2080 Ti's 21,513 — the GeForce RTX 2080 Ti leads by 173.4%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 2080 Ti uses Turing, both on a 12 nm process. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 4,352 (GeForce RTX 2080 Ti). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 13.45 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2080 Ti). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1545 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
G3D Mark Score	7,869	21,513+173%
Architecture	Turing	Turing
Process Node	12 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	896	4352+386%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS	13.45 TFLOPS+351%
Boost Clock	1665 MHz+8%	1545 MHz
ROPs	32	88+175%
TMUs	56	272+386%
L1 Cache	0.88 MB	4.3 MB+389%
L2 Cache	1 MB	5.5 MB+450%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
Upscaling Tech	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)	DLSS 2.0
Frame Generation	FSR 3 (Compatible)	FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 2080 Ti has 11 GB. The GeForce RTX 2080 Ti offers 175% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 616 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2080 Ti) — a 381.3% advantage for the GeForce RTX 2080 Ti. Bus width: 128-bit vs 352-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 5.5 MB (GeForce RTX 2080 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 2080 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	11 GB+175%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	128 GB/s	616 GB/s+381%
Bus Width	128-bit	352-bit+175%
L2 Cache	1 MB	5.5 MB+450%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12.1 (GeForce RTX 2080 Ti). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
DirectX	12	12.1
Vulkan	1.4+17%	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3	4+33%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 6th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 2080 Ti). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs 4th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (GeForce RTX 2080 Ti).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
Encoder	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)	6th Gen NVENC
Decoder	NVDEC 4th gen	4th Gen NVDEC
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the GeForce RTX 2080 Ti's 250W — a 107.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 2080 Ti). Power connectors: None vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 85°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
TDP	75W-70%	250W
Recommended PSU	300W-54%	650W
Power Connector	None	2x 8-pin
Length	229mm	267mm
Height	111mm	116mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	70°C-18%	85°C
Perf/Watt	104.9+22%	86.1

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $75, while the GeForce RTX 2080 Ti launched at $999 and now averages $600. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 87.5% less ($525 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 35.9 (GeForce RTX 2080 Ti) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 192.2% better value. The GeForce GTX 1650 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2018).