CPU
GPU
GeForce GTX 1650
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3090 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 273.6% higher G3D Mark score and 500% more VRAM (24 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1650.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-273.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+273.6%) |
| Longevity | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (24 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Very Large (Check Case) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $75 versus $1,100 for the GeForce RTX 3090 Ti, it costs 93% less. While it maintains significantly lower raw performance, this results in a 292.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+292.6%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($75) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,100) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3090 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 27 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1560 MHz to 1860 MHz. It has 10752 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 450W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 84 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 29,395 points. Launch price was $1,999.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the GeForce RTX 3090 Ti's 29,395 — the GeForce RTX 3090 Ti leads by 273.6%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 3090 Ti uses Ampere, both on 12 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 10,752 (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 40 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1860 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,869 | 29,395+274% |
| Architecture | Turing | Ampere |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 896 | 10752+1100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.984 TFLOPS | 40 TFLOPS+1240% |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz | 1860 MHz+12% |
| ROPs | 32 | 112+250% |
| TMUs | 56 | 336+500% |
| L1 Cache | 0.88 MB | 10.5 MB+1093% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 6 MB+500% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3090 Ti has 24 GB. The GeForce RTX 3090 Ti offers 500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1008 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) — a 687.5% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3090 Ti. Bus width: 128-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 6 MB (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 3090 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 24 GB+500% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 128 GB/s | 1008 GB/s+688% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 384-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 6 MB+500% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 7th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5th gen (Volta) | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th gen | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the GeForce RTX 3090 Ti's 450W — a 142.9% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 850W (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti). Power connectors: None vs 16-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 336mm, occupying 2 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-83% | 450W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-65% | 850W |
| Power Connector | None | 16-pin |
| Length | 229mm | 336mm |
| Height | 111mm | 140mm |
| Slots | 2-33% | 3 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-18% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 104.9+61% | 65.3 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $75, while the GeForce RTX 3090 Ti launched at $1999 and now averages $1100. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 93.2% less ($1025 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 26.7 (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 292.9% better value. The GeForce RTX 3090 Ti is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149-93% | $1999 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $75-93% | $1100 |
| Performance per Dollar | 104.9+293% | 26.7 |
| Codename | TU117 | GA102 |
| Release | April 23 2019 | January 27 2022 |
| Ranking | #323 | #19 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 1650 and GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
