GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
GeForce GTX 1650
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 304.5% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (16 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1650.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-304.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+304.5%) |
| Longevity | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (310mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $75 versus $800 for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER, it costs 91% less. While it maintains significantly lower raw performance, this results in a 163.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+163.7%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($75) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($800) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 8 2024. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2340 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 8448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 66 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,828 points. Launch price was $799.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's 31,828 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER leads by 304.5%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER uses Ada Lovelace, both on 12 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 8,448 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 44.1 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 2610 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,869 | 31,828+304% |
| Architecture | Turing | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 896 | 8448+843% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.984 TFLOPS | 44.1 TFLOPS+1378% |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz | 2610 MHz+57% |
| ROPs | 32 | 96+200% |
| TMUs | 56 | 264+371% |
| L1 Cache | 0.88 MB | 8.3 MB+843% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 48 MB+4700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 1650 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | DLSS 3.5 |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | DLSS 3.0 (Native) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has 16 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 672 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) — a 425% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 16 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 128 GB/s | 672 GB/s+425% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 48 MB+4700% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs NVENC 8th gen (Dual) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5th gen (Volta) | NVENC 8th gen (Dual) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th gen | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 | AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's 285W — a 116.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 750W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER). Power connectors: None vs 16-pin (12VHPWR). Card length: 229mm vs 310mm, occupying 2 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 72°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-74% | 285W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-60% | 750W |
| Power Connector | None | 16-pin (12VHPWR) |
| Length | 229mm | 310mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2-33% | 3 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-3% | 72°C |
| Perf/Watt | 104.9 | 111.7+6% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $75, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER launched at $799 and now averages $800. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 90.6% less ($725 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 39.8 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 163.6% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149-81% | $799 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $75-91% | $800 |
| Performance per Dollar | 104.9+164% | 39.8 |
| Codename | TU117 | AD103 |
| Release | April 23 2019 | January 8 2024 |
| Ranking | #323 | #10 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 1650 and GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
