GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce RTX 4090 D

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce RTX 4090 D is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 290.5% higher G3D Mark score and 500% more VRAM (24 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1650.

Insight	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce RTX 4090 D
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-290.5%)	✅Leading raw performance (+290.5%)
Longevity	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)	🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	🎮 High Capacity (24 GB)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	Standard Size (304mm)

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $75 versus $1,599 for the GeForce RTX 4090 D, it costs 95% less. While it maintains significantly lower raw performance, this results in a 446% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce RTX 4090 D
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+446%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($75)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,599)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

GeForce RTX 4090 D Benchmark Check

Loading...

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and GeForce RTX 4090 D

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

GeForce RTX 4090 D

The GeForce RTX 4090 D is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 28 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2280 MHz to 2520 MHz. It has 14592 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 425W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 114 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 30,725 points. Launch price was $1,599.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the GeForce RTX 4090 D's 30,725 — the GeForce RTX 4090 D leads by 290.5%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 4090 D uses Ada Lovelace, both on 12 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 14,592 (GeForce RTX 4090 D). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 73.54 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4090 D). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 2520 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce RTX 4090 D
G3D Mark Score	7,869	30,725+290%
Architecture	Turing	Ada Lovelace
Process Node	12 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	896	14592+1529%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS	73.54 TFLOPS+2364%
Boost Clock	1665 MHz	2520 MHz+51%
ROPs	32	176+450%
TMUs	56	456+714%
L1 Cache	0.88 MB	14.3 MB+1525%
L2 Cache	1 MB	72 MB+7100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4090 D is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 1650 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce RTX 4090 D
Upscaling Tech	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)	DLSS 3.5
Frame Generation	FSR 3 (Compatible)	DLSS 3.0 (Native)
Ray Reconstruction	No	Yes (DLSS 3.5)
Low Latency	Standard	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4090 D has 24 GB. The GeForce RTX 4090 D offers 500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1008 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4090 D) — a 687.5% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4090 D. Bus width: 128-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 72 MB (GeForce RTX 4090 D) — the GeForce RTX 4090 D has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce RTX 4090 D
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	24 GB+500%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6X
Memory Bandwidth	128 GB/s	1008 GB/s+688%
Bus Width	128-bit	384-bit+200%
L2 Cache	1 MB	72 MB+7100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4090 D). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce RTX 4090 D
DirectX	12	12 Ultimate
Vulkan	1.4	1.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3	4+33%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2x NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4090 D). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs NVDEC (5th Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4090 D).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce RTX 4090 D
Encoder	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)	2x NVENC (8th Gen)
Decoder	NVDEC 4th gen	NVDEC (5th Gen)
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9	H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the GeForce RTX 4090 D's 425W — a 140% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 850W (GeForce RTX 4090 D). Power connectors: None vs 16-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 304mm, occupying 2 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 78°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce RTX 4090 D
TDP	75W-82%	425W
Recommended PSU	300W-65%	850W
Power Connector	None	16-pin
Length	229mm	304mm
Height	111mm	137mm
Slots	2-33%	3
Temp (Load)	70°C-10%	78°C
Perf/Watt	104.9+45%	72.3

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $75, while the GeForce RTX 4090 D launched at $1599. The GeForce RTX 4090 D is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2019).