CPU
GPU
GeForce GTX 1650
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is significantly newer (2025 vs 2019). The GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 1650 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 230.4% higher G3D Mark score and 200% more VRAM (12 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1650.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-230.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+230.4%) |
| Longevity | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Blackwell (2024−2025) / 4nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile
GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.
GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile
The GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 2 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 2130 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,000 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile's 26,000 — the GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile leads by 230.4%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile uses Blackwell 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 5,888 (GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 2130 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,869 | 26,000+230% |
| Architecture | Turing | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 896 | 5888+557% |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz | 2130 MHz+28% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has 12 GB. The GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 672 GB/s (GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile) — a 425% advantage for the GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 12 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 128 GB/s | 672 GB/s+425% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs NVENC (Blackwell) (GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs NVDEC (Blackwell). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2 (GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5th gen (Volta) | NVENC (Blackwell) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th gen | NVDEC (Blackwell) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 | H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile's 115W — a 42.1% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 130W (GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile). Power connectors: None vs Mobile. Card length: 229mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-35% | 115W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W | 130W-57% |
| Power Connector | None | Mobile |
| Length | 229mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-13% | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 104.9 | 226.1+116% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $75 | — |
| Codename | TU117 | GN22-X7 |
| Release | April 23 2019 | January 2 2025 |
| Ranking | #323 | #não classificado |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 1650 and GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile
