GeForce GTX 1650 vs Intel Arc Pro A30M
GeForce GTX 1650
Popular choices:
Intel Arc Pro A30M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Intel Arc Pro A30M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 34.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Intel Arc Pro A30M.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1650 | Intel Arc Pro A30M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+34.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-34.2%) |
| Longevity | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) | Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) (6nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 1650 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and Intel Arc Pro A30M
GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.
Intel Arc Pro A30M
The Intel Arc Pro A30M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 8 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,862 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Intel Arc Pro A30M's 5,862 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 34.2%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Intel Arc Pro A30M uses Generation 12.7, both on 12 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1,024 (Intel Arc Pro A30M). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 4.096 TFLOPS (Intel Arc Pro A30M). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 2000 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Intel Arc Pro A30M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,869+34% | 5,862 |
| Architecture | Turing | Generation 12.7 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 896 | 1024+14% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.984 TFLOPS | 4.096 TFLOPS+37% |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz | 2000 MHz+20% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 56 | 64+14% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 4 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Intel Arc Pro A30M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | XeSS |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 4 MB (Intel Arc Pro A30M) — the Intel Arc Pro A30M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Intel Arc Pro A30M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 128 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 4 MB+300% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Intel Arc Pro A30M's 50W — a 40% difference. The Intel Arc Pro A30M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (Intel Arc Pro A30M). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Intel Arc Pro A30M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 50W-33% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 104.9 | 117.2+12% |
Value Analysis
The Intel Arc Pro A30M is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Intel Arc Pro A30M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $75 | — |
| Codename | TU117 | DG2-128 |
| Release | April 23 2019 | August 8 2022 |
| Ranking | #323 | #402 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 1650 and Intel Arc Pro A30M
