GeForce GTX 1650 vs Arc Pro B50

Performance Spectrum - GPU

GeForce GTX 1650

75

7,869

0.0%

GeForce GTX 880M SLI

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

GeForce GTX 960

GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

GeForce GTX 1080

GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

Intel Arc Pro B50

70

12,208

+55.1%

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Intel Arc Pro B50

#9

Intel Arc Pro B50

MSRP: $349|Avg: $349

100%

#11

Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)

MSRP: $900|Avg: $300

95%

#16

Radeon PRO W7500

MSRP: $429|Avg: $401

89%

#18

Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $340

88%

#19

RTX A2000 12GB

MSRP: $449|Avg: $380

87%

#20

Radeon Pro Vega 56

MSRP: $399|Avg: $60

87%

#21

RTX A2000

MSRP: $450|Avg: $320

86%

#23

Intel Arc Pro B60

MSRP: $500|Avg: $450

79%

#24

Radeon PRO W7600

MSRP: $599|Avg: $599

78%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Intel Arc Pro B50 is significantly newer (2025 vs 2019). The Intel Arc Pro B50 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 1650 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Intel Arc Pro B50 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 55.1% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1650.

Insight	GeForce GTX 1650	Intel Arc Pro B50
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-55.1%)	✅Leading raw performance (+55.1%)
Longevity	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)	🔮Strong Longevity (Xe2 (2024) / 5nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	🎮 High Capacity (8 GB)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $75 versus $349 for the Intel Arc Pro B50, it costs 79% less. While it maintains lower overall performance, this results in a 199.9% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	GeForce GTX 1650	Intel Arc Pro B50
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+199.9%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($75)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($349)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

Intel Arc Pro B50 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and Intel Arc Pro B50

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel Arc Pro B50

The Intel Arc Pro B50 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2025. It features the Xe2 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 2600 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,208 points. Launch price was $349.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Intel Arc Pro B50's 12,208 — the Intel Arc Pro B50 leads by 55.1%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Intel Arc Pro B50 uses Xe2, both on 12 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2,048 (Intel Arc Pro B50). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 10.65 TFLOPS (Intel Arc Pro B50). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 2600 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Intel Arc Pro B50
G3D Mark Score	7,869	12,208+55%
Architecture	Turing	Xe2
Process Node	12 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	896	2048+129%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS	10.65 TFLOPS+257%
Boost Clock	1665 MHz	2600 MHz+56%
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	56	128+129%
L2 Cache	1 MB	4 MB+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Intel Arc Pro B50
Upscaling Tech	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)	XeSS
Frame Generation	FSR 3 (Compatible)	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Intel Arc Pro B50 has 8 GB. The Intel Arc Pro B50 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 4 MB (Intel Arc Pro B50) — the Intel Arc Pro B50 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Intel Arc Pro B50
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	8 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB	4 MB+300%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12.2 (Intel Arc Pro B50). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Intel Arc Pro B50
DirectX	12	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.4	1.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3	4+33%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs Dual Arc Media Engine (Intel Arc Pro B50). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs Dual Arc Media Engine. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Intel Arc Pro B50).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Intel Arc Pro B50
Encoder	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)	Dual Arc Media Engine
Decoder	NVDEC 4th gen	Dual Arc Media Engine
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Intel Arc Pro B50's 70W — a 6.9% difference. The Intel Arc Pro B50 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 500W (Intel Arc Pro B50). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 167mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Intel Arc Pro B50
TDP	75W	70W-7%
Recommended PSU	300W-40%	500W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	229mm	167mm
Height	111mm	69mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	70°C-7%	75°C
Perf/Watt	104.9	174.4+66%

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $75, while the Intel Arc Pro B50 launched at $349 and now averages $349. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 78.5% less ($274 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 35.0 (Intel Arc Pro B50) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 199.7% better value. The Intel Arc Pro B50 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2019).