GeForce GTX 1650 vs Intel UHD Graphics 750
GeForce GTX 1650
Popular choices:
Intel UHD Graphics 750
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 362.3% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (4 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Intel UHD Graphics 750.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1650 | Intel UHD Graphics 750 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+362.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-362.3%) |
| Longevity | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) | Generation 12.1 (2020−2021) (14nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 1650 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and Intel UHD Graphics 750
GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.
Intel UHD Graphics 750
The Intel UHD Graphics 750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in March 30 2021. It features the Generation 12.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1300 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,702 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Intel UHD Graphics 750's 1,702 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 362.3%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Intel UHD Graphics 750 uses Generation 12.1, both on 12 nm vs 14 nm+++. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 256 (Intel UHD Graphics 750). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 0.6656 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics 750). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1300 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Intel UHD Graphics 750 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,869+362% | 1,702 |
| Architecture | Turing | Generation 12.1 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 14 nm+++ |
| Shading Units | 896+250% | 256 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.984 TFLOPS+348% | 0.6656 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz+28% | 1300 MHz |
| ROPs | 32+300% | 8 |
| TMUs | 56+250% | 16 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Intel UHD Graphics 750 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Intel UHD Graphics 750 has 0 MB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Intel UHD Graphics 750 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 128 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Intel UHD Graphics 750's 15W — a 133.3% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics 750 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1W (Intel UHD Graphics 750). Power connectors: None vs Integrated.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Intel UHD Graphics 750 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 15W-80% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | None | Integrated |
| Length | 229mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 104.9 | 113.5+8% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $75, while the Intel UHD Graphics 750 launched at $0 and now averages $0. The Intel UHD Graphics 750 costs 100+% less ($75 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs Infinity (Intel UHD Graphics 750) — the Intel UHD Graphics 750 offers Infinity% better value. The Intel UHD Graphics 750 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Intel UHD Graphics 750 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $75 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 104.9 | Infinity |
| Codename | TU117 | Rocket Lake GT1 |
| Release | April 23 2019 | March 30 2021 |
| Ranking | #323 | #722 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 1650 and Intel UHD Graphics 750
