GeForce GTX 1650 vs Iris Pro Graphics P580

Performance Spectrum - GPU

GeForce GTX 1650

75

7,869

+288.4%

GeForce GTX 880M SLI

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

GeForce GTX 960

GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

GeForce GTX 1080

GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

Iris Pro Graphics P580

15

2,026

0.0%

Iris Graphics 6100

HD Graphics 630

Iris Plus Graphics 640

Iris Plus Graphics 650

Iris Plus Graphics 950

Arc A530M

Arc A770M

Arc B580

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Iris Pro Graphics P580

#316

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

804%

#318

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

728%

#319

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

727%

#323

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

661%

#324

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

656%

#326

Iris Pro Graphics P580

MSRP: $150|Avg: $60

100%

#327

Radeon E8870PCIe

MSRP: $250|Avg: $200

100%

#330

Arc Graphics 140T

MSRP: $350|Avg: $300

95%

#331

Radeon 680M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $80

95%

#333

GeForce 730A

MSRP: $60|Avg: $20

94%

#334

GeForce GT 745A

MSRP: $99|Avg: $20

92%

#335

GeForce 710A

MSRP: $35|Avg: $62

92%

#336

Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual

MSRP: $100|Avg: $10

90%

#338

GeForce MX230

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

90%

#340

RADEON HD6410D

MSRP: $35|Avg: $5

89%

#341

GeForce 820M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30

89%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce GTX 1650 uses modern memory architecture. The GeForce GTX 1650 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Iris Pro Graphics P580 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 288.4% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (4 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Iris Pro Graphics P580.

Insight	GeForce GTX 1650	Iris Pro Graphics P580
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+288.4%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-288.4%)
Longevity	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Generation 9.0 (2015−2016))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100+%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	—

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $75 (vs $60), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 210.7% better value per dollar than the Iris Pro Graphics P580.

Insight	GeForce GTX 1650	Iris Pro Graphics P580
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+210.7%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($75)	✅More affordable ($60)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

Iris Pro Graphics P580 Benchmark Check

Loading...

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and Iris Pro Graphics P580

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Iris Pro Graphics P580

The Iris Pro Graphics P580 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 1 2015. It features the Generation 9.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1050 MHz. It has 576 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,026 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Iris Pro Graphics P580's 2,026 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 288.4%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Iris Pro Graphics P580 uses Generation 9.0, both on 12 nm vs 14 nm+. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 576 (Iris Pro Graphics P580). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1.21 TFLOPS (Iris Pro Graphics P580). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1050 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Iris Pro Graphics P580
G3D Mark Score	7,869+288%	2,026
Architecture	Turing	Generation 9.0
Process Node	12 nm	14 nm+
Shading Units	896+56%	576
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS+147%	1.21 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1665 MHz+59%	1050 MHz
ROPs	32+256%	9
TMUs	56	72+29%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Iris Pro Graphics P580
Upscaling Tech	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	FSR 3 (Compatible)	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Pro Graphics P580 has 0 MB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Iris Pro Graphics P580
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	Shared System RAM
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Memory Bandwidth	128 GB/s	System
Bus Width	128-bit	System

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Iris Pro Graphics P580's 15W — a 133.3% difference. The Iris Pro Graphics P580 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1W (Iris Pro Graphics P580). Power connectors: None vs Integrated.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Iris Pro Graphics P580
TDP	75W	15W-80%
Recommended PSU	300W	1W-100%
Power Connector	None	Integrated
Length	229mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	70°C	—
Perf/Watt	104.9	135.1+29%

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $75, while the Iris Pro Graphics P580 launched at $150 and now averages $60. The Iris Pro Graphics P580 costs 20% less ($15 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 33.8 (Iris Pro Graphics P580) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 210.4% better value. The GeForce GTX 1650 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2015).