
GeForce GTX 1650 vs L2

GeForce GTX 1650
Popular choices:

L2
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar L2
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 43.9% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the L2.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1650 | L2 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+43.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-43.9%) |
| Longevity | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) | Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) (5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $75 versus $1,500 for the L2, it costs 95% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 2778.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1650 | L2 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+2778.7%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($75) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,500) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and L2

GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

L2
The L2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 16 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1440 MHz to 2520 MHz. It has 11776 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 92 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,467 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the L2's 5,467 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 43.9%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the L2 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 12 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 11,776 (L2). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 59.35 TFLOPS (L2). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 2520 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | L2 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,869+44% | 5,467 |
| Architecture | Turing | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 896 | 11776+1214% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.984 TFLOPS | 59.35 TFLOPS+1889% |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz | 2520 MHz+51% |
| ROPs | 32 | 128+300% |
| TMUs | 56 | 368+557% |
| L1 Cache | 0.88 MB | 11.5 MB+1207% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 96 MB+9500% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | L2 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 96 MB (L2) — the L2 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | L2 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 96 MB+9500% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12_2 (L2). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | L2 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12_2 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs NVENC 8th Gen (L2). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs NVDEC 5th Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs H.264,H.265,AV1 (L2).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | L2 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5th gen (Volta) | NVENC 8th Gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th gen | NVDEC 5th Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 | H.264,H.265,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the L2's 275W — a 114.3% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (L2). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 168mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | L2 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-73% | 275W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | 168mm |
| Height | 111mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 104.9+427% | 19.9 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $75, while the L2 launched at $2000 and now averages $1500. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 95% less ($1425 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 3.6 (L2) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 2813.9% better value. The L2 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | L2 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149-93% | $2000 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $75-95% | $1500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 104.9+2814% | 3.6 |
| Codename | TU117 | AD102 |
| Release | April 23 2019 | November 16 2023 |
| Ranking | #323 | #189 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















