GeForce GTX 1650 vs Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi

#616

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

4783%

#618

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

4336%

#619

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

4324%

#623

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

3932%

#624

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

3905%

#626

Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi

MSRP: $49|Avg: $10

100%

#627

Radeon HD 8570D + HD 8470 Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $50

99%

#628

GeForce 9500M GS

MSRP: $60|Avg: $15

98%

#629

GeForce 8800 GS

MSRP: $150|Avg: $40

97%

#631

GeForce 9800 GTX+

MSRP: $229|Avg: $50

94%

#632

Mobility Radeon X1700

MSRP: $49|Avg: $15

94%

#633

Mobility Radeon HD 560v

MSRP: $150|Avg: $30

93%

#634

GeForce 9300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $20

93%

#635

Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU

MSRP: $899|Avg: $400

93%

#636

GeForce 8400M G

MSRP: $50|Avg: $20

93%

#637

Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT

MSRP: $49|Avg: $49

92%

#638

GeForce 8400M GS

MSRP: $50|Avg: $20

92%

#639

GeForce 9100

MSRP: $40|Avg: $5

90%

#640

GeForce 8300

MSRP: $50|Avg: $50

90%

#641

GeForce 9600M GT

MSRP: $80|Avg: $20

90%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce GTX 1650 is significantly newer (2019 vs 2009). The GeForce GTX 1650 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 6989.2% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (4 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi.

Insight	GeForce GTX 1650	Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+6989.2%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-6989.2%)
Longevity	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / TeraScale (2005−2013))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+700%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	—

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $75 (vs $10), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 845.2% better value per dollar than the Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi.

Insight	GeForce GTX 1650	Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+845.2%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($75)	✅More affordable ($10)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi

The Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 550 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 111 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi's 111 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 6989.2%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi uses TeraScale, both on 12 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 0.88 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi
G3D Mark Score	7,869+6989%	111
Architecture	Turing	TeraScale
Process Node	12 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	896+12%	800
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS+239%	0.88 TFLOPS
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	56+40%	40
L1 Cache	896 KB+460%	160 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi
Upscaling Tech	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	FSR 3 (Compatible)	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi has 512 MB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 0.25 MB (Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi) — the GeForce GTX 1650 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+700%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	128 GB/s	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	0.25 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 10.1 (Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi
DirectX	12+19%	10.1
Max Displays	3+50%	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs UVD (Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs UVD.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi
Encoder	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)	UVD
Decoder	NVDEC 4th gen	UVD
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9	—

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi's 30W — a 85.7% difference. The Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi
TDP	75W	30W-60%
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	229mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	70°C-13%	80°C
Perf/Watt	104.9+2735%	3.7

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $75, while the Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi launched at $49 and now averages $10. The Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi costs 86.7% less ($65 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 11.1 (Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 845% better value. The GeForce GTX 1650 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2009).