GeForce GTX 1650 vs MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL

#675

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

8899%

#677

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

8067%

#678

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

8046%

#682

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

7316%

#683

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

7266%

#685

MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL

MSRP: $49|Avg: $10

100%

#686

GeForce 9300M GS

MSRP: $100|Avg: $10

97%

#687

Mobility Radeon HD 2400

MSRP: $79|Avg: $1

93%

#688

GeForce 6150 LE

MSRP: $30|Avg: $10

90%

#689

Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2

MSRP: $449|Avg: $50

87%

#690

GeForce 9450

MSRP: $100|Avg: $25

86%

#691

GeForce 9800 GX2

MSRP: $599|Avg: $75

84%

#692

GeForce 7900 GS

MSRP: $259|Avg: $50

83%

#693

MOBILITY RADEON X600

MSRP: $50|Avg: $10

82%

#694

Mobility Radeon HD 4250

MSRP: $100|Avg: $15

80%

#695

Mobility Radeon X2300

MSRP: $49|Avg: $15

80%

#696

Mobility Radeon X2300 HD

MSRP: $50|Avg: $10

80%

#697

Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT

MSRP: $199|Avg: $12

79%

#698

GeForce 8800 GTX

MSRP: $599|Avg: $50

76%

#699

GeForce 8600 GTS

MSRP: $199|Avg: $35

76%

#700

Mobility Radeon HD 3450

MSRP: $100|Avg: $15

75%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce GTX 1650 is significantly newer (2019 vs 2009). The GeForce GTX 1650 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 13015% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (4 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL.

Insight	GeForce GTX 1650	MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+13015%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-13015%)
Longevity	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / TeraScale (2005−2013))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+700%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $75 (vs $10), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 1648.7% better value per dollar than the MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL.

Insight	GeForce GTX 1650	MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+1648.7%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($75)	✅More affordable ($10)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL

The MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 550 MHz. It has 800 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 60 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL's 60 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 13015%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL uses TeraScale, both on 12 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 800 (MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 0.88 TFLOPS ×2 (MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL
G3D Mark Score	7,869+13015%	60
Architecture	Turing	TeraScale
Process Node	12 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	896+12%	800 ×2
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS+239%	0.88 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs	32+100%	16 ×2
TMUs	56+40%	40 ×2
L1 Cache	896 KB+460%	160 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL
Upscaling Tech	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	FSR 3 (Compatible)	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL has 512 MB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 0.25 MB (MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL) — the GeForce GTX 1650 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+700%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	128 GB/s	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	0.25 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 9_0b (MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 0.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL
DirectX	12+33%	9_0b
OpenGL	4.6+119%	2.1
Max Displays	3	0

🎬

Media & Encoding

Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs MPEG-1,MPEG-2,DivX,WMV9 (MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL
Encoder	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)	—
Decoder	NVDEC 4th gen	—
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9	MPEG-1,MPEG-2,DivX,WMV9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL's 30W — a 85.7% difference. The MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL
TDP	75W	30W-60%
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	229mm	1mm
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	70°C	—
Perf/Watt	104.9+5145%	2.0

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $75, while the MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL launched at $49 and now averages $10. The MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL costs 86.7% less ($65 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 6.0 (MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 1648.3% better value. The GeForce GTX 1650 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2009).