GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVS 810

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar NVS 810

#116

Radeon Pro SSG

MSRP: $6999|Avg: $1500

92%

#294

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

8690%

#309

NVS 810

MSRP: $700|Avg: $80

100%

#310

GRID P40-2Q

MSRP: $5699|Avg: $340

99%

#311

Quadro 2000D

MSRP: $599|Avg: $40

96%

#312

FirePro 3D V8800

MSRP: $1499|Avg: $30

96%

#313

Quadro K5000

MSRP: $2499|Avg: $60

94%

#314

Quadro 2000

MSRP: $599|Avg: $25

93%

#315

FirePro S7150

MSRP: $2399|Avg: $459

92%

#317

FirePro W9000

MSRP: $3999|Avg: $150

91%

#318

GRID M60-4Q

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $120

90%

#319

FirePro V8800

MSRP: $1499|Avg: $100

89%

#320

Quadro K6000

MSRP: $5265|Avg: $300

89%

#321

NVS 510

MSRP: $449|Avg: $15

89%

#322

GRID M60-1Q

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $50

87%

#323

GRID K280Q

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $50

84%

#324

FirePro M2000

MSRP: $300|Avg: $50

84%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce GTX 1650 uses modern memory architecture. The GeForce GTX 1650 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The NVS 810 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 560.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the NVS 810.

Insight	GeForce GTX 1650	NVS 810
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+560.2%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-560.2%)
Longevity	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $75 versus $80 for the NVS 810, it costs 6% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 604.2% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	GeForce GTX 1650	NVS 810
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+604.2%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($75)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($80)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

NVS 810 Benchmark Check

Loading...

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and NVS 810

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

NVS 810

The NVS 810 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 4 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 902 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 512 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 68W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,192 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the NVS 810's 1,192 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 560.2%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the NVS 810 uses Maxwell, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 512 (NVS 810). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1.058 TFLOPS ×2 (NVS 810). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1033 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	NVS 810
G3D Mark Score	7,869+560%	1,192
Architecture	Turing	Maxwell
Process Node	12 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	896+75%	512 ×2
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS+182%	1.058 TFLOPS ×2
Boost Clock	1665 MHz+61%	1033 MHz
ROPs	32+100%	16 ×2
TMUs	56+75%	32 ×2
L1 Cache	896 KB+250%	256 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	NVS 810
Upscaling Tech	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	FSR 3 (Compatible)	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	NVS 810
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12 (12_1) (NVS 810). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 8.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	NVS 810
DirectX	12	12 (12_1)
Vulkan	1.4+8%	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3	8+167%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs NVENC 5 (NVS 810). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs NVDEC 2. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs H.264,H.265 (NVS 810).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	NVS 810
Encoder	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)	NVENC 5
Decoder	NVDEC 4th gen	NVDEC 2
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9	H.264,H.265

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the NVS 810's 68W — a 9.8% difference. The NVS 810 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (NVS 810). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 198mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	NVS 810
TDP	75W	68W-9%
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	229mm	198mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	70°C-13%	80°C
Perf/Watt	104.9+499%	17.5

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $75, while the NVS 810 launched at $700 and now averages $80. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 6.3% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 14.9 (NVS 810) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 604% better value. The GeForce GTX 1650 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2015).