GeForce GTX 1650 vs Quadro 400

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro 400

#344

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

16788%

#359

FirePro 2260

MSRP: $129|Avg: $15

100%

#360

Quadro 400

MSRP: $169|Avg: $500

100%

#361

Quadro FX 380 LP

MSRP: $169|Avg: $15

98%

#363

Quadro FX 1800

MSRP: $489|Avg: $100

92%

#364

FirePro 3D V8700

MSRP: $1499|Avg: $1229

91%

#365

FirePro 3D V9800

MSRP: $3499|Avg: $80

91%

#366

Quadro 5000

MSRP: $2499|Avg: $100

90%

#367

FirePro V5700

MSRP: $599|Avg: $20

89%

#368

FirePro V9800

MSRP: $3499|Avg: $250

89%

#369

FirePro 3D V8750

MSRP: $1799|Avg: $500

81%

#370

FirePro 3D V7750

MSRP: $799|Avg: $20

77%

#371

GRID M10-2B

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $80

75%

#372

Quadro FX 370

MSRP: $129|Avg: $500

74%

#373

GRID M6-0B

MSRP: $1500|Avg: $100

69%

#374

Quadro 6000

MSRP: $4399|Avg: $150

69%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce GTX 1650 uses modern memory architecture. The GeForce GTX 1650 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro 400 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 5216.9% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (4 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro 400.

Insight	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro 400
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+5216.9%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-5216.9%)
Longevity	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+700%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $75 versus $500 for the Quadro 400, it costs 85% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 35345.9% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro 400
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+35345.9%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($75)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

Quadro 400 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and Quadro 400

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Quadro 400

The Quadro 400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 7 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1252 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 148 points. Launch price was $119.99.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Quadro 400's 148 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 5216.9%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Quadro 400 uses Pascal, both on 12 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 256 (Quadro 400). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 0.641 TFLOPS (Quadro 400). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1252 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro 400
G3D Mark Score	7,869+5217%	148
Architecture	Turing	Pascal
Process Node	12 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	896+250%	256
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS+366%	0.641 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1665 MHz+33%	1252 MHz
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	56+250%	16
L1 Cache	896 KB+833%	96 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro 400
Upscaling Tech	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	FSR 3 (Compatible)	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro 400 has 512 MB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 0.5 MB (Quadro 400) — the GeForce GTX 1650 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro 400
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+700%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	0.5 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 10_1 (Quadro 400). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro 400
DirectX	12+20%	10_1
Max Displays	3+50%	2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Quadro 400's 30W — a 85.7% difference. The Quadro 400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (Quadro 400). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 168mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro 400
TDP	75W	30W-60%
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	229mm	168mm
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	70°C	—
Perf/Watt	104.9+2041%	4.9

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $75, while the Quadro 400 launched at $169 and now averages $500. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 85% less ($425 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 0.3 (Quadro 400) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 34866.7% better value. The GeForce GTX 1650 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2017).