GeForce GTX 1650 vs Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)

#9

Intel Arc Pro B50

MSRP: $349|Avg: $349

105%

#11

Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)

MSRP: $900|Avg: $300

100%

#16

Radeon PRO W7500

MSRP: $429|Avg: $401

93%

#18

Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $340

92%

#19

RTX A2000 12GB

MSRP: $449|Avg: $380

92%

#20

Radeon Pro Vega 56

MSRP: $399|Avg: $60

91%

#21

RTX A2000

MSRP: $450|Avg: $320

90%

#23

Intel Arc Pro B60

MSRP: $500|Avg: $450

83%

#24

Radeon PRO W7600

MSRP: $599|Avg: $599

82%

#25

RTX 2000 Ada Generation

MSRP: $625|Avg: $750

82%

#26

Radeon Pro Vega 48

MSRP: $450|Avg: $450

75%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 280.8% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1650.

Insight	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-280.8%)	✅Leading raw performance (+280.8%)
Longevity	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)	🏆Elite Architecture (Turing (2018−2022) / 12nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	🎮 High Capacity (8 GB)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	—

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $75 versus $300 for the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel), it costs 75% less. While it maintains significantly lower raw performance, this results in a 5% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+5%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($75)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($300)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)

The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1110 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 29,964 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)'s 29,964 — the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) leads by 280.8%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) uses Turing, both on a 12 nm process. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2,560 (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 7.987 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1560 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)
G3D Mark Score	7,869	29,964+281%
Architecture	Turing	Turing
Process Node	12 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	896	2560+186%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS	7.987 TFLOPS+168%
Boost Clock	1665 MHz+7%	1560 MHz
ROPs	32	64+100%
TMUs	56	160+186%
L1 Cache	0.88 MB	2.5 MB+184%
L2 Cache	1 MB	4 MB+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 1650 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)
Upscaling Tech	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)	DLSS 3.5
Frame Generation	FSR 3 (Compatible)	DLSS 3.0 (Native)
Ray Reconstruction	No	Yes (DLSS 3.5)
Low Latency	Standard	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) has 8 GB. The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 4 MB (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) — the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	8 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	256-bit+100%
L2 Cache	1 MB	4 MB+300%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12.1 (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 1.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)
DirectX	12	12.1
Vulkan	1.4+17%	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3+200%	1

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 6th Gen NVENC (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs 4th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)
Encoder	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)	6th Gen NVENC
Decoder	NVDEC 4th gen	4th Gen NVDEC
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)'s 110W — a 37.8% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 650W (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)
TDP	75W-32%	110W
Recommended PSU	300W-54%	650W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	229mm	0mm
Height	111mm	0mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	70°C-7%	75°C
Perf/Watt	104.9	272.4+160%

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $75, while the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) launched at $900 and now averages $300. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 75% less ($225 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 99.9 (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 5% better value.