GeForce GTX 1650 vs Quadro T1000 (móvel)
GeForce GTX 1650
Popular choices:
Quadro T1000 (móvel)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Quadro T1000 (móvel)
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 57.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro T1000 (móvel).
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1650 | Quadro T1000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+57.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-57.4%) |
| Longevity | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $75 versus $120 for the Quadro T1000 (móvel), it costs 38% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 151.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1650 | Quadro T1000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+151.8%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($75) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($120) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and Quadro T1000 (móvel)
GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.
Quadro T1000 (móvel)
The Quadro T1000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1455 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,000 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Quadro T1000 (móvel)'s 5,000 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 57.4%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Quadro T1000 (móvel) uses Turing, both on a 12 nm process. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 768 (Quadro T1000 (móvel)). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2.235 TFLOPS (Quadro T1000 (móvel)). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1455 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Quadro T1000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,869+57% | 5,000 |
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 896+17% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.984 TFLOPS+34% | 2.235 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz+14% | 1455 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 56+17% | 48 |
| L1 Cache | 896 KB+17% | 768 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Quadro T1000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Quadro T1000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Quadro T1000 (móvel)'s 50W — a 40% difference. The Quadro T1000 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (Quadro T1000 (móvel)). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Quadro T1000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 50W-33% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 104.9+5% | 100.0 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $75, while the Quadro T1000 (móvel) launched at $500 and now averages $120. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 37.5% less ($45 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 41.7 (Quadro T1000 (móvel)) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 151.6% better value.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Quadro T1000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149-70% | $500 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $75-38% | $120 |
| Performance per Dollar | 104.9+152% | 41.7 |
| Codename | TU117 | TU117 |
| Release | April 23 2019 | May 27 2019 |
| Ranking | #323 | #374 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 1650 and Quadro T1000 (móvel)
