GeForce GTX 1650
VS
Quadro T1000 Max-Q

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Quadro T1000 Max-Q

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

2019Core: 1485 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro T1000 Max-Q

2019Core: 765 MHzBoost: 1350 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro T1000 Max-Q

#2
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
236%
#17
Quadro T1000 Max-Q
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#26
RTX A400
MSRP: $135|Avg: $135
71%
#29
Radeon Pro 5500 XT
MSRP: $199|Avg: $100
64%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 57.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro T1000 Max-Q.

InsightGeForce GTX 1650Quadro T1000 Max-Q
Performance
Leading raw performance (+57.4%)
Lower raw frame rates (-57.4%)
Longevity
Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 1650 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and Quadro T1000 Max-Q

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

NVIDIA

Quadro T1000 Max-Q

The Quadro T1000 Max-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 765 MHz to 1350 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,000 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Quadro T1000 Max-Q's 5,000 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 57.4%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Quadro T1000 Max-Q uses Turing, both on a 12 nm process. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 896 (Quadro T1000 Max-Q). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2.419 TFLOPS (Quadro T1000 Max-Q). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1350 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Quadro T1000 Max-Q
G3D Mark Score
7,869+57%
5,000
Architecture
Turing
Turing
Process Node
12 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
896
896
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.984 TFLOPS+23%
2.419 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1665 MHz+23%
1350 MHz
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
56
56
L1 Cache
896 KB
896 KB
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Quadro T1000 Max-Q
Upscaling Tech
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Quadro T1000 Max-Q
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Quadro T1000 Max-Q's 50W — a 40% difference. The Quadro T1000 Max-Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (Quadro T1000 Max-Q). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Quadro T1000 Max-Q
TDP
75W
50W-33%
Recommended PSU
300W-14%
350W
Power Connector
None
PCIe-powered
Length
229mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
Temp (Load)
70°C
Perf/Watt
104.9+5%
100.0