GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon 6600M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon 6600M

#577

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

3643%

#579

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

3303%

#580

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

3294%

#584

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

2995%

#585

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

2975%

#587

Radeon 6600M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#588

Mobility Radeon HD 4350

MSRP: $50|Avg: $15

99%

#589

GeForce 405

MSRP: $40|Avg: $5

99%

#590

Mobility Radeon HD 3670

MSRP: $79|Avg: $15

99%

#591

Mobility Radeon HD 5650

MSRP: $150|Avg: $30

99%

#592

GeForce 510

MSRP: $99|Avg: $15

98%

#593

Mobility Radeon HD 3650

MSRP: $49|Avg: $15

96%

#594

GeForce 9300M G

MSRP: $30|Avg: $30

95%

#596

GeForce 9800 GT

MSRP: $160|Avg: $20

94%

#598

GeForce 9100M G

MSRP: $30|Avg: $10

93%

#599

Mobility Radeon X1900

MSRP: $49|Avg: $15

93%

#600

Mobility Radeon HD 4330

MSRP: $49|Avg: $49

93%

#601

GeForce 210

MSRP: $50|Avg: $5

93%

#602

Radeon R7 M365X

MSRP: $300|Avg: $300

92%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1368.1% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (4 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon 6600M.

Insight	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon 6600M
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+1368.1%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1368.1%)
Longevity	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (6nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+700%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 1650 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

Radeon 6600M Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and Radeon 6600M

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Radeon 6600M

The Radeon 6600M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1900 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 536 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Radeon 6600M's 536 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 1368.1%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Radeon 6600M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 384 (Radeon 6600M). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1.459 TFLOPS (Radeon 6600M). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1900 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon 6600M
G3D Mark Score	7,869+1368%	536
Architecture	Turing	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	12 nm	6 nm
Shading Units	896+133%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS+105%	1.459 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1665 MHz	1900 MHz+14%
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	56+133%	24
L1 Cache	896 KB+600%	128 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon 6600M
Upscaling Tech	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	FSR 3 (Compatible)	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon 6600M has 512 MB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2 MB (Radeon 6600M) — the Radeon 6600M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon 6600M
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+700%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Memory Bandwidth	128 GB/s	System
Bus Width	128-bit	System
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Radeon 6600M's 40W — a 60.9% difference. The Radeon 6600M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (Radeon 6600M). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon 6600M
TDP	75W	40W-47%
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	229mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	70°C	—
Perf/Watt	104.9+683%	13.4