GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon AI PRO R9700

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon AI PRO R9700

#18

Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $340

139%

#19

RTX A2000 12GB

MSRP: $449|Avg: $380

139%

#20

Radeon Pro Vega 56

MSRP: $399|Avg: $60

138%

#21

RTX A2000

MSRP: $450|Avg: $320

136%

#23

Intel Arc Pro B60

MSRP: $500|Avg: $450

125%

#24

Radeon PRO W7600

MSRP: $599|Avg: $599

125%

#25

RTX 2000 Ada Generation

MSRP: $625|Avg: $750

125%

#26

Radeon Pro Vega 48

MSRP: $450|Avg: $450

114%

#27

Radeon Pro 5700 XT

MSRP: $500|Avg: $280

113%

#28

Quadro P5200

MSRP: $500|Avg: $240

106%

#29

Radeon PRO W7700

MSRP: $999|Avg: $999

105%

#30

Radeon PRO W6600

MSRP: $649|Avg: $649

105%

#32

Radeon AI PRO R9700

MSRP: $1299|Avg: $1450

100%

#33

Radeon Pro Vega 64

MSRP: $599|Avg: $114

98%

#38

Radeon PRO W6600X

MSRP: $699|Avg: $699

85%

#41

Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)

MSRP: $600|Avg: $600

82%

#42

Radeon Pro W5700

MSRP: $799|Avg: $300

82%

#43

Radeon Pro W5700X

MSRP: $999|Avg: $999

80%

#44

RTX A4000

MSRP: $1111|Avg: $1111

80%

#45

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell

MSRP: $849|Avg: $748

77%

#46

Quadro RTX 4000

MSRP: $899|Avg: $220

75%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon AI PRO R9700 is significantly newer (2025 vs 2019). The Radeon AI PRO R9700 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 1650 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon AI PRO R9700 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 263.3% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (32 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1650.

Insight	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon AI PRO R9700
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-263.3%)	✅Leading raw performance (+263.3%)
Longevity	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)	🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 4.0 (2025) / 4nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	🎮 High Capacity (32 GB)
Efficiency	Normal Efficiency	Normal Efficiency
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	Standard Size (267mm)

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $75 versus $1,450 for the Radeon AI PRO R9700, it costs 95% less. While it maintains significantly lower raw performance, this results in a 432.1% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon AI PRO R9700
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+432.1%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($75)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,450)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

Radeon AI PRO R9700 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

No prediction data available

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

No prediction data available

League of Legends

League of Legends

No prediction data available

Valorant

Valorant

No prediction data available

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and Radeon AI PRO R9700

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Radeon AI PRO R9700

The Radeon AI PRO R9700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 23 2025. It features the RDNA 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1660 MHz to 2920 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 28,589 points. Launch price was $1,299.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Radeon AI PRO R9700's 28,589 — the Radeon AI PRO R9700 leads by 263.3%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Radeon AI PRO R9700 uses RDNA 4.0, both on 12 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 4,096 (Radeon AI PRO R9700). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 47.84 TFLOPS (Radeon AI PRO R9700). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 2920 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon AI PRO R9700
G3D Mark Score	7,869	28,589+263%
Architecture	Turing	RDNA 4.0
Process Node	12 nm	4 nm
Shading Units	896	4096+357%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS	47.84 TFLOPS+1503%
Boost Clock	1665 MHz	2920 MHz+75%
ROPs	32	128+300%
TMUs	56	256+357%
L2 Cache	1 MB	8 MB+700%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon AI PRO R9700
Upscaling Tech	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	FSR 3 (Compatible)	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon AI PRO R9700 has 32 GB. The Radeon AI PRO R9700 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 8 MB (Radeon AI PRO R9700) — the Radeon AI PRO R9700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon AI PRO R9700
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	32 GB+700%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	256-bit+100%
L2 Cache	1 MB	8 MB+700%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12.2 (Radeon AI PRO R9700). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon AI PRO R9700
DirectX	12	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.4+8%	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3	4+33%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs VCN 5.0 (Radeon AI PRO R9700). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs VCN 5.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon AI PRO R9700).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon AI PRO R9700
Encoder	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)	VCN 5.0
Decoder	NVDEC 4th gen	VCN 5.0
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Radeon AI PRO R9700's 300W — a 120% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 650W (Radeon AI PRO R9700). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon AI PRO R9700
TDP	75W-75%	300W
Recommended PSU	300W-54%	650W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	229mm	267mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	70°C-7%	75°C
Perf/Watt	104.9+10%	95.3

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $75, while the Radeon AI PRO R9700 launched at $1299 and now averages $1450. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 94.8% less ($1375 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 19.7 (Radeon AI PRO R9700) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 432.5% better value. The Radeon AI PRO R9700 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2019).