GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon HD 4250

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 4250

#1

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

MSRP: $399|Avg: $280

2949%

#2

GeForce RTX 5060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

2833%

#3

Radeon RX 5600 XT

MSRP: $279|Avg: $180

2800%

#4

Radeon RX 9060

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

2795%

#5

GeForce RTX 5050

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

2789%

#6

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

MSRP: $249|Avg: $150

2774%

#7

Arc A580

MSRP: $179|Avg: $179

2739%

#8

Radeon RX 9060 XT

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

2728%

#9

Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

2703%

#10

Radeon RX 7600

MSRP: $269|Avg: $250

2696%

#11

Radeon RX 6600

MSRP: $329|Avg: $180

2663%

#12

GeForce RTX 4060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

2658%

#13

Arc B570

MSRP: $219|Avg: $219

2610%

#14

Arc B580

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

2608%

#284

Radeon R5 430 OEM

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13

3252%

#299

Radeon HD 4250

MSRP: $50|Avg: $10

100%

#300

Radeon HD 6310

MSRP: $50|Avg: $50

99%

#301

GeForce GTX 295

MSRP: $499|Avg: $50

98%

#302

Radeon HD 4870 X2

MSRP: $550|Avg: $550

97%

#303

Radeon HD 3850 X2

MSRP: $349|Avg: $349

96%

#305

Radeon HD 4290

MSRP: $60|Avg: $10

96%

#306

Radeon HD 5450

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

92%

#308

Radeon HD 3850

MSRP: $179|Avg: $179

91%

#309

Radeon HD 4200

MSRP: $50|Avg: $10

91%

#310

Radeon HD 4270

MSRP: $50|Avg: $10

89%

#312

Radeon E6460

MSRP: $150|Avg: $40

88%

#313

Radeon HD 6290

MSRP: $50|Avg: $50

85%

#314

GeForce GTX 280

MSRP: $649|Avg: $649

80%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce GTX 1650 is significantly newer (2019 vs 2008). The GeForce GTX 1650 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon HD 4250 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 6297.6% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (4 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 4250.

Insight	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon HD 4250
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+6297.6%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-6297.6%)
Longevity	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / TeraScale (2005−2013))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+700%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $75 (vs $10), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 753% better value per dollar than the Radeon HD 4250.

Insight	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon HD 4250
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+753%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($75)	✅More affordable ($10)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

Radeon HD 4250 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and Radeon HD 4250

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Radeon HD 4250

The Radeon HD 4250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 25 2008. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 123 points. Launch price was $199.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Radeon HD 4250's 123 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 6297.6%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Radeon HD 4250 uses TeraScale, both on 12 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 800 (Radeon HD 4250). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 4250).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon HD 4250
G3D Mark Score	7,869+6298%	123
Architecture	Turing	TeraScale
Process Node	12 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	896+12%	800
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS+198%	1 TFLOPS
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	56+40%	40
L1 Cache	896 KB+460%	160 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon HD 4250
Upscaling Tech	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	FSR 3 (Compatible)	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 4250 has 512 MB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon HD 4250) — the GeForce GTX 1650 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon HD 4250
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+700%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	128 GB/s	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	0.25 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 10.1 (Radeon HD 4250). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon HD 4250
DirectX	12+19%	10.1
Max Displays	3+50%	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs UVD 2 (Radeon HD 4250). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs UVD 2.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon HD 4250
Encoder	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)	UVD 2
Decoder	NVDEC 4th gen	UVD 2
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9	—

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Radeon HD 4250's 110W — a 37.8% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (Radeon HD 4250). Power connectors: None vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon HD 4250
TDP	75W-32%	110W
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	1x 6-pin
Length	229mm	1mm
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	70°C	—
Perf/Watt	104.9+9436%	1.1

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $75, while the Radeon HD 4250 launched at $50 and now averages $10. The Radeon HD 4250 costs 86.7% less ($65 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12.3 (Radeon HD 4250) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 752.8% better value. The GeForce GTX 1650 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2008).