GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon HD 4770

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 4770

#1

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

MSRP: $399|Avg: $280

870%

#2

GeForce RTX 5060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

836%

#3

Radeon RX 5600 XT

MSRP: $279|Avg: $180

826%

#4

Radeon RX 9060

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

824%

#5

GeForce RTX 5050

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

823%

#6

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

MSRP: $249|Avg: $150

818%

#7

Arc A580

MSRP: $179|Avg: $179

808%

#8

Radeon RX 9060 XT

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

805%

#9

Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

797%

#10

Radeon RX 7600

MSRP: $269|Avg: $250

795%

#11

Radeon RX 6600

MSRP: $329|Avg: $180

786%

#12

GeForce RTX 4060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

784%

#13

Arc B570

MSRP: $219|Avg: $219

770%

#14

Arc B580

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

769%

#87

Radeon RX 7500

MSRP: $229|Avg: $229

98%

#88

Radeon Ryzen 5 5500H

MSRP: $250|Avg: $250

97%

#89

Moore Threads MTT S70

MSRP: $345|Avg: $140

93%

#134

Radeon R5 430 OEM

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13

959%

#149

Radeon HD 4770

MSRP: $109|Avg: $109

100%

#150

Radeon HD 8510G

MSRP: $45|Avg: $5

99%

#151

Radeon HD 8550G

MSRP: $50|Avg: $50

99%

#152

GeForce GT 635

MSRP: $99|Avg: $20

98%

#154

Radeon R7 A8-7500

MSRP: $100|Avg: $50

97%

#156

Radeon HD 5670

MSRP: $99|Avg: $15

97%

#157

GeForce GT 740A

MSRP: $89|Avg: $20

96%

#158

Radeon HD 7420G

MSRP: $40|Avg: $5

95%

#159

Radeon HD 7500G

MSRP: $40|Avg: $5

95%

#161

GeForce GT 430

MSRP: $79|Avg: $40

91%

#164

Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)

MSRP: $173|Avg: $35

90%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce GTX 1650 is significantly newer (2019 vs 2009). The GeForce GTX 1650 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon HD 4770 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 765.7% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (4 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 4770.

Insight	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon HD 4770
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+765.7%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-765.7%)
Longevity	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / TeraScale (2005−2013))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+700%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $75 versus $109 for the Radeon HD 4770, it costs 31% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 1158.1% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon HD 4770
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+1158.1%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($75)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($109)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

Radeon HD 4770 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and Radeon HD 4770

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Radeon HD 4770

The Radeon HD 4770 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 28 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 909 points. Launch price was $109.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Radeon HD 4770's 909 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 765.7%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Radeon HD 4770 uses TeraScale, both on 12 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 640 (Radeon HD 4770). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 0.96 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 4770).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon HD 4770
G3D Mark Score	7,869+766%	909
Architecture	Turing	TeraScale
Process Node	12 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	896+40%	640
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS+211%	0.96 TFLOPS
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	56+75%	32
L1 Cache	896 KB+600%	128 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB+669%	0.13 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon HD 4770
Upscaling Tech	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	FSR 3 (Compatible)	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 4770 has 512 MB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 0.13 MB (Radeon HD 4770) — the GeForce GTX 1650 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon HD 4770
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+700%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	128 GB/s	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB+669%	0.13 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 10.1 (Radeon HD 4770). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon HD 4770
DirectX	12+19%	10.1
OpenGL	4.6+39%	3.3
Max Displays	3	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs UVD 2.2. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,DivX (Radeon HD 4770).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon HD 4770
Encoder	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)	—
Decoder	NVDEC 4th gen	UVD 2.2
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,DivX

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Radeon HD 4770's 80W — a 6.5% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 400W (Radeon HD 4770). Power connectors: None vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 203mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 72°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon HD 4770
TDP	75W-6%	80W
Recommended PSU	300W-25%	400W
Power Connector	None	1x 6-pin
Length	229mm	203mm
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	70°C-3%	72°C
Perf/Watt	104.9+820%	11.4

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $75, while the Radeon HD 4770 launched at $109 and now averages $109. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 31.2% less ($34 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 8.3 (Radeon HD 4770) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 1163.9% better value. The GeForce GTX 1650 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2009).