GeForce GTX 1650
VS
Radeon HD 5470

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon HD 5470

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

2019Core: 1485 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 5470

2009Core: 725 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 5470

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
2246%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
2158%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
2133%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
2129%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
2124%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
2112%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
2086%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
2078%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
2059%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
2053%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
2028%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
2024%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
1988%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
1986%
#271
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
2477%
#286
Radeon HD 5470
MSRP: $83|Avg: $83
100%
#287
GeForce GT 220
MSRP: $69|Avg: $49
100%
#288
Radeon R7 A10-8850
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
96%
#290
GeForce G210
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
92%
#291
Radeon HD 4850 X2
MSRP: $399|Avg: $40
88%
#292
Radeon HD 4330
MSRP: $50|Avg: $9
84%
#293
GeForce GTX 260
MSRP: $449|Avg: $449
83%
#294
Radeon HD 8490
MSRP: $99|Avg: $35
82%
#295
Radeon HD 8650D
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
82%
#297
Radeon HDG 4670
MSRP: $67|Avg: $15
79%
#298
Radeon HD 3870
MSRP: $219|Avg: $15
78%
#299
Radeon HD 4250
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
76%
#300
Radeon HD 6310
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
76%
#301
GeForce GTX 295
MSRP: $499|Avg: $50
74%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce GTX 1650 is significantly newer (2019 vs 2009). The GeForce GTX 1650 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon HD 5470 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2836.2% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (4 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 5470.

InsightGeForce GTX 1650Radeon HD 5470
Performance
Leading raw performance (+2836.2%)
Lower raw frame rates (-2836.2%)
Longevity
Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+700%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $75 versus $83 for the Radeon HD 5470, it costs 10% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 3149.4% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightGeForce GTX 1650Radeon HD 5470
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+3149.4%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($75)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($83)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and Radeon HD 5470

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

AMD

Radeon HD 5470

The Radeon HD 5470 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 18 2009. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 1600 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 294W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 268 points. Launch price was $699.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Radeon HD 5470's 268 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 2836.2%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Radeon HD 5470 uses TeraScale 2, both on 12 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1,600 (Radeon HD 5470). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2.32 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon HD 5470).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon HD 5470
G3D Mark Score
7,869+2836%
268
Architecture
Turing
TeraScale 2
Process Node
12 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
896
1600 ×2+79%
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.984 TFLOPS+29%
2.32 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs
32
32 ×2
TMUs
56
80 ×2+43%
L1 Cache
896 KB+180%
320 KB
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
0.5 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon HD 5470
Upscaling Tech
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 5470 has 512 MB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 5470) — the GeForce GTX 1650 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon HD 5470
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+700%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
128 GB/s
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
0.5 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Radeon HD 5470's 294W — a 118.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (Radeon HD 5470). Power connectors: None vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon HD 5470
TDP
75W-74%
294W
Recommended PSU
300W-14%
350W
Power Connector
None
1x 6-pin
Length
229mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
Temp (Load)
70°C
Perf/Watt
104.9+11556%
0.9
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $75, while the Radeon HD 5470 launched at $83 and now averages $83. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 9.6% less ($8 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 3.2 (Radeon HD 5470) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 3178.1% better value. The GeForce GTX 1650 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2009).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon HD 5470
MSRP
$149
$83-44%
Avg Price (30d)
$75-10%
$83
Performance per Dollar
104.9+3178%
3.2
Codename
TU117
Hemlock
Release
April 23 2019
November 18 2009
Ranking
#323
#651