GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon HD 8310E

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 8310E

#1

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

MSRP: $399|Avg: $280

1064%

#2

GeForce RTX 5060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

1022%

#3

Radeon RX 5600 XT

MSRP: $279|Avg: $180

1010%

#4

Radeon RX 9060

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

1008%

#5

GeForce RTX 5050

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

1006%

#6

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

MSRP: $249|Avg: $150

1000%

#7

Arc A580

MSRP: $179|Avg: $179

988%

#8

Radeon RX 9060 XT

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

984%

#9

Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

975%

#10

Radeon RX 7600

MSRP: $269|Avg: $250

972%

#11

Radeon RX 6600

MSRP: $329|Avg: $180

961%

#12

GeForce RTX 4060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

959%

#13

Arc B570

MSRP: $219|Avg: $219

941%

#14

Arc B580

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

941%

#94

Radeon Ryzen 5 5600H

MSRP: $350|Avg: $350

100%

#95

Radeon Ryzen 5 5500U

MSRP: $300|Avg: $300

99%

#166

Radeon R5 430 OEM

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13

1173%

#181

Radeon HD 8310E

MSRP: $50|Avg: $50

100%

#183

GeForce GT 610

MSRP: $49|Avg: $49

99%

#185

Radeon HD 6530D

MSRP: $50|Avg: $10

99%

#186

Radeon HD 8450G

MSRP: $50|Avg: $50

98%

#187

Radeon HD 4830

MSRP: $130|Avg: $20

98%

#188

GeForce GT 140

MSRP: $99|Avg: $15

98%

#189

GeForce GT 530

MSRP: $100|Avg: $20

97%

#190

GeForce GT 620

MSRP: $59|Avg: $20

96%

#191

Radeon R7 A8-7600

MSRP: $119|Avg: $25

95%

#192

GeForce GTS 240

MSRP: $80|Avg: $40

94%

#193

RADEON HD6370D

MSRP: $50|Avg: $10

94%

#194

Radeon HD 7310

MSRP: $20|Avg: $5

94%

#195

GeForce GT 625

MSRP: $60|Avg: $15

92%

#196

Radeon HD 5600/5700

MSRP: $99|Avg: $99

91%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce GTX 1650 is significantly newer (2019 vs 2010). The GeForce GTX 1650 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon HD 8310E lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2207.6% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (4 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 8310E.

Insight	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon HD 8310E
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+2207.6%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-2207.6%)
Longevity	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+700%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	—

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $75 (vs $50), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 1438.4% better value per dollar than the Radeon HD 8310E.

Insight	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon HD 8310E
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+1438.4%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($75)	✅More affordable ($50)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

Radeon HD 8310E Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and Radeon HD 8310E

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Radeon HD 8310E

The Radeon HD 8310E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 25 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 1120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 341 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Radeon HD 8310E's 341 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 2207.6%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Radeon HD 8310E uses TeraScale 2, both on 12 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1,120 (Radeon HD 8310E). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1.792 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8310E).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon HD 8310E
G3D Mark Score	7,869+2208%	341
Architecture	Turing	TeraScale 2
Process Node	12 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	896	1120+25%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS+67%	1.792 TFLOPS
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	56	56
L1 Cache	896 KB+700%	112 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon HD 8310E
Upscaling Tech	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	FSR 3 (Compatible)	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 8310E has 512 MB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 8310E) — the GeForce GTX 1650 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon HD 8310E
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+700%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	128 GB/s	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	0.5 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Radeon HD 8310E's 175W — a 80% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8310E). Power connectors: None vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon HD 8310E
TDP	75W-57%	175W
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	1x 6-pin
Length	229mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	70°C	—
Perf/Watt	104.9+5421%	1.9

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $75, while the Radeon HD 8310E launched at $50 and now averages $50. The Radeon HD 8310E costs 33.3% less ($25 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 6.8 (Radeon HD 8310E) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 1442.6% better value. The GeForce GTX 1650 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2010).