GeForce GTX 1650 vs RADEON HD6370D

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar RADEON HD6370D

#1

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

MSRP: $399|Avg: $280

1133%

#2

GeForce RTX 5060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

1089%

#3

Radeon RX 5600 XT

MSRP: $279|Avg: $180

1076%

#4

Radeon RX 9060

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

1074%

#5

GeForce RTX 5050

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

1072%

#6

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

MSRP: $249|Avg: $150

1066%

#7

Arc A580

MSRP: $179|Avg: $179

1053%

#8

Radeon RX 9060 XT

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

1049%

#9

Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

1039%

#10

Radeon RX 7600

MSRP: $269|Avg: $250

1036%

#11

Radeon RX 6600

MSRP: $329|Avg: $180

1024%

#12

GeForce RTX 4060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

1022%

#13

Arc B570

MSRP: $219|Avg: $219

1003%

#14

Arc B580

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

1002%

#96

Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U

MSRP: $250|Avg: $250

97%

#178

Radeon R5 430 OEM

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13

1250%

#193

RADEON HD6370D

MSRP: $50|Avg: $10

100%

#194

Radeon HD 7310

MSRP: $20|Avg: $5

100%

#195

GeForce GT 625

MSRP: $60|Avg: $15

98%

#196

Radeon HD 5600/5700

MSRP: $99|Avg: $99

97%

#197

GeForce GT 240

MSRP: $80|Avg: $80

97%

#199

GeForce GT 705

MSRP: $60|Avg: $15

96%

#200

Radeon HD 7340

MSRP: $25|Avg: $5

96%

#201

Radeon HD 5570

MSRP: $80|Avg: $80

93%

#202

GeForce GT 320

MSRP: $79|Avg: $30

93%

#203

Radeon R5 A6-8500P

MSRP: $100|Avg: $50

92%

#204

Radeon HD 7580D

MSRP: $60|Avg: $15

91%

#205

Radeon HD 7470

MSRP: $50|Avg: $15

90%

#206

Radeon R5 A240

MSRP: $100|Avg: $10

90%

#207

Radeon HD 6550D

MSRP: $70|Avg: $70

89%

#208

Radeon HD 4670

MSRP: $67|Avg: $67

89%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce GTX 1650 is significantly newer (2019 vs 2010). The GeForce GTX 1650 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The RADEON HD6370D lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2359.1% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (4 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RADEON HD6370D.

Insight	GeForce GTX 1650	RADEON HD6370D
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+2359.1%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-2359.1%)
Longevity	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+700%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	—

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $75 (vs $10), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 227.9% better value per dollar than the RADEON HD6370D.

Insight	GeForce GTX 1650	RADEON HD6370D
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+227.9%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($75)	✅More affordable ($10)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

RADEON HD6370D Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and RADEON HD6370D

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

RADEON HD6370D

The RADEON HD6370D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 880 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 320 points. Launch price was $369.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the RADEON HD6370D's 320 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 2359.1%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the RADEON HD6370D uses TeraScale 3, both on 12 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1,536 (RADEON HD6370D). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2.703 TFLOPS (RADEON HD6370D). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 880 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RADEON HD6370D
G3D Mark Score	7,869+2359%	320
Architecture	Turing	TeraScale 3
Process Node	12 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	896	1536+71%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS+10%	2.703 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1665 MHz+89%	880 MHz
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	56	96+71%
L1 Cache	896 KB+367%	192 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RADEON HD6370D
Upscaling Tech	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	FSR 3 (Compatible)	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the RADEON HD6370D has 512 MB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 0.5 MB (RADEON HD6370D) — the GeForce GTX 1650 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RADEON HD6370D
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+700%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	128 GB/s	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	0.5 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the RADEON HD6370D's 250W — a 107.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (RADEON HD6370D). Power connectors: None vs Legacy.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RADEON HD6370D
TDP	75W-70%	250W
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	Legacy
Length	229mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	70°C	—
Perf/Watt	104.9+7969%	1.3

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $75, while the RADEON HD6370D launched at $50 and now averages $10. The RADEON HD6370D costs 86.7% less ($65 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 32.0 (RADEON HD6370D) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 227.8% better value. The GeForce GTX 1650 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2010).