GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU

#33

Radeon Pro Vega 64

MSRP: $599|Avg: $114

138%

#38

Radeon PRO W6600X

MSRP: $699|Avg: $699

120%

#41

Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)

MSRP: $600|Avg: $600

115%

#42

Radeon Pro W5700

MSRP: $799|Avg: $300

115%

#43

Radeon Pro W5700X

MSRP: $999|Avg: $999

113%

#44

RTX A4000

MSRP: $1111|Avg: $1111

112%

#45

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell

MSRP: $849|Avg: $748

108%

#46

Quadro RTX 4000

MSRP: $899|Avg: $220

106%

#48

Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#49

RTX 2000E Ada Generation

MSRP: $999|Avg: $999

98%

#50

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1750

96%

#51

RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell

MSRP: $2399|Avg: $2015

94%

#52

RTX A1000

MSRP: $749|Avg: $500

92%

#54

Radeon Pro 5700

MSRP: $799|Avg: $250

92%

#55

Quadro P4000

MSRP: $815|Avg: $290

90%

#57

Quadro RTX 3000

MSRP: $800|Avg: $891

87%

#58

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1700

85%

#59

Radeon Vega Frontier Edition

MSRP: $999|Avg: $150

82%

#60

Radeon Pro WX 8200

MSRP: $999|Avg: $350

81%

#62

RTX A4500

MSRP: $1699|Avg: $800

79%

#63

RTX 4500 Ada Generation

MSRP: $2250|Avg: $2000

79%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 98.7% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (32 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1650.

Insight	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-98.7%)	✅Leading raw performance (+98.7%)
Longevity	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / RDNA 2.0)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+700%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	Standard Size (267mm)

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU Benchmark Check

Loading...

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU

The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 26 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 3584 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,633 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU's 15,633 — the Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU leads by 98.7%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU uses GCN 5.0, both on 12 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 3,584 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 10.75 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1500 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
G3D Mark Score	7,869	15,633+99%
Architecture	Turing	GCN 5.0
Process Node	12 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	896	3584 ×2+300%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS	10.75 TFLOPS ×2+260%
Boost Clock	1665 MHz+11%	1500 MHz
ROPs	32	64 ×2+100%
TMUs	56	224 ×2+300%
L1 Cache	896 KB	896 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB	4 MB+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
Upscaling Tech	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	FSR 3 (Compatible)	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU has 32 GB. The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU) — the Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	32 GB+700%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB	4 MB+300%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12.2 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 0.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
DirectX	12	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.4+8%	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3	0

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
Encoder	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)	VCN 3.0
Decoder	NVDEC 4th gen	VCN 3.0
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU's 300W — a 120% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 650W (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
TDP	75W-75%	300W
Recommended PSU	300W-54%	650W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	229mm	267mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	70°C-7%	75°C
Perf/Watt	104.9+101%	52.1