GeForce GTX 1650
VS
Radeon Pro Vega 64X

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon Pro Vega 64X

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

2019Core: 1485 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon Pro Vega 64X

2019Core: 1250 MHzBoost: 1468 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro Vega 64X

#70
Radeon PRO W6800
MSRP: $2249|Avg: $2249
148%
#72
Quadro P4200
MSRP: $1200|Avg: $110
142%
#74
RTX 5000 Ada Generation
MSRP: $4000|Avg: $4095
125%
#75
Radeon Pro Vega II
MSRP: $2199|Avg: $1800
117%
#76
Radeon PRO W7900
MSRP: $3999|Avg: $3500
116%
#77
Radeon Pro VII
MSRP: $1899|Avg: $1400
115%
#78
Quadro RTX 5000
MSRP: $2299|Avg: $692
111%
#79
Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)
MSRP: $2299|Avg: $692
110%
#80
Radeon Pro W6800X
MSRP: $2799|Avg: $2799
106%
#81
Tesla T10
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $975
103%
#82
RTX A5000
MSRP: $3721|Avg: $1800
101%
#83
Radeon Pro Vega 64X
MSRP: $2200|Avg: $2200
100%
#84
Radeon PRO V710
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $2000
99%
#85
RTX A5500
MSRP: $3600|Avg: $2200
96%
#86
Radeon Pro WX 9100
MSRP: $2199|Avg: $550
92%
#87
A10G
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $2000
89%
#88
Tesla T4
MSRP: $1880|Avg: $1000
89%
#89
Tesla M40 24GB
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $120
88%
#90
Quadro P5000
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $400
84%
#91
RTX PRO 6000
MSRP: $8565|Avg: $8565
82%
#92
RTX A6000
MSRP: $4649|Avg: $3500
81%
#93
Quadro RTX A6000
MSRP: $4649|Avg: $3500
81%
#94
RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell
MSRP: $6999|Avg: $4799
73%
#96
L4
MSRP: $2345|Avg: $1800
71%
#97
RTX 6000 Ada Generation
MSRP: $6799|Avg: $5500
69%
#98
RTX 5880 Ada Generation
MSRP: $6000|Avg: $6000
69%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon Pro Vega 64X is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 69.9% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTX 1650 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightGeForce GTX 1650Radeon Pro Vega 64X
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-69.9%)
Leading raw performance (+69.9%)
Longevity
Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) (14nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+100+%)
Standard Buffer (0 MB)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $75 versus $2,200 for the Radeon Pro Vega 64X, it costs 97% less. While it maintains lower overall performance, this results in a 1626.6% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightGeForce GTX 1650Radeon Pro Vega 64X
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+1626.6%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($75)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($2,200)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and Radeon Pro Vega 64X

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

AMD

Radeon Pro Vega 64X

The Radeon Pro Vega 64X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 19 2019. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1250 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,369 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Radeon Pro Vega 64X's 13,369 — the Radeon Pro Vega 64X leads by 69.9%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Radeon Pro Vega 64X uses GCN 5.0, both on 12 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 4,096 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12.03 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 64X). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1468 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon Pro Vega 64X
G3D Mark Score
7,869
13,369+70%
Architecture
Turing
GCN 5.0
Process Node
12 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
896
4096+357%
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.984 TFLOPS
12.03 TFLOPS+303%
Boost Clock
1665 MHz+13%
1468 MHz
ROPs
32
64+100%
TMUs
56
256+357%
L1 Cache
0.88 MB
1 MB+14%
L2 Cache
1 MB
4 MB+300%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon Pro Vega 64X
Upscaling Tech
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro Vega 64X has 0 MB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro Vega 64X) — the Radeon Pro Vega 64X has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon Pro Vega 64X
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB
4 MB+300%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon Pro Vega 64X
DirectX
12
12.1
Vulkan
1.4+27%
1.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
3
4+33%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon Pro Vega 64X
Encoder
NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
VCE 4.0
Decoder
NVDEC 4th gen
UVD 7.0
Codecs
H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Radeon Pro Vega 64X's 250W — a 107.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 64X). Power connectors: None vs Integrated. Card length: 229mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 85°C.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon Pro Vega 64X
TDP
75W-70%
250W
Recommended PSU
300W
1W-100%
Power Connector
None
Integrated
Length
229mm
0mm
Height
111mm
0mm
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
70°C-18%
85°C
Perf/Watt
104.9+96%
53.5
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $75, while the Radeon Pro Vega 64X launched at $2200 and now averages $2200. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 96.6% less ($2125 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 6.1 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 1619.7% better value.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon Pro Vega 64X
MSRP
$149-93%
$2200
Avg Price (30d)
$75-97%
$2200
Performance per Dollar
104.9+1620%
6.1
Codename
TU117
Vega 10
Release
April 23 2019
March 19 2019
Ranking
#323
#190