GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon PRO W7500

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon PRO W7500

#9

Intel Arc Pro B50

MSRP: $349|Avg: $349

113%

#11

Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)

MSRP: $900|Avg: $300

107%

#16

Radeon PRO W7500

MSRP: $429|Avg: $401

100%

#18

Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $340

99%

#19

RTX A2000 12GB

MSRP: $449|Avg: $380

99%

#20

Radeon Pro Vega 56

MSRP: $399|Avg: $60

98%

#21

RTX A2000

MSRP: $450|Avg: $320

97%

#23

Intel Arc Pro B60

MSRP: $500|Avg: $450

89%

#24

Radeon PRO W7600

MSRP: $599|Avg: $599

89%

#25

RTX 2000 Ada Generation

MSRP: $625|Avg: $750

89%

#26

Radeon Pro Vega 48

MSRP: $450|Avg: $450

81%

#27

Radeon Pro 5700 XT

MSRP: $500|Avg: $280

80%

#28

Quadro P5200

MSRP: $500|Avg: $240

75%

#29

Radeon PRO W7700

MSRP: $999|Avg: $999

74%

#30

Radeon PRO W6600

MSRP: $649|Avg: $649

74%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon PRO W7500 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 69% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1650.

Insight	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon PRO W7500
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-69%)	✅Leading raw performance (+69%)
Longevity	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)	🔮Strong Longevity (RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) / 6nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	🎮 High Capacity (8 GB)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $75 versus $401 for the Radeon PRO W7500, it costs 81% less. While it maintains lower overall performance, this results in a 216.4% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon PRO W7500
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+216.4%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($75)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($401)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

Radeon PRO W7500 Benchmark Check

Loading...

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and Radeon PRO W7500

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Radeon PRO W7500

The Radeon PRO W7500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1700 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,298 points. Launch price was $429.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Radeon PRO W7500's 13,298 — the Radeon PRO W7500 leads by 69%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Radeon PRO W7500 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 12 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1,792 (Radeon PRO W7500). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12.19 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W7500). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1700 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon PRO W7500
G3D Mark Score	7,869	13,298+69%
Architecture	Turing	RDNA 3.0
Process Node	12 nm	6 nm
Shading Units	896	1792+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS	12.19 TFLOPS+309%
Boost Clock	1665 MHz	1700 MHz+2%
ROPs	32	64+100%
TMUs	56	112+100%
L1 Cache	896 KB+75%	512 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon PRO W7500
Upscaling Tech	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	FSR 3 (Compatible)	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W7500 has 8 GB. The Radeon PRO W7500 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2 MB (Radeon PRO W7500) — the Radeon PRO W7500 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon PRO W7500
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	8 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	256-bit+100%
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7500). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon PRO W7500
DirectX	12	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.4+8%	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3	4+33%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7500). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7500).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon PRO W7500
Encoder	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)	VCN 4.0
Decoder	NVDEC 4th gen	VCN 4.0
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Radeon PRO W7500's 70W — a 6.9% difference. The Radeon PRO W7500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 500W (Radeon PRO W7500). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 216mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon PRO W7500
TDP	75W	70W-7%
Recommended PSU	300W-40%	500W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	229mm	216mm
Height	111mm	115mm
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	70°C-7%	75°C
Perf/Watt	104.9	190.0+81%

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $75, while the Radeon PRO W7500 launched at $429 and now averages $401. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 81.3% less ($326 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 33.2 (Radeon PRO W7500) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 216% better value. The Radeon PRO W7500 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2019).