GeForce GTX 1650
VS
Radeon Pro WX 7100

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon Pro WX 7100

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

2019Core: 1485 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon Pro WX 7100

2016Core: 1188 MHzBoost: 1243 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro WX 7100

#70
Radeon PRO W6800
MSRP: $2249|Avg: $2249
93%
#72
Quadro P4200
MSRP: $1200|Avg: $110
90%
#129
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
1532%
#144
Radeon Pro WX 7100
MSRP: $799|Avg: $180
100%
#145
Quadro M520
MSRP: $200|Avg: $50
99%
#146
Radeon Sky 500
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
98%
#147
Quadro M5000
MSRP: $999|Avg: $120
98%
#148
Radeon Pro WX 4100
MSRP: $399|Avg: $85
96%
#149
Quadro P4000 (móvel)
MSRP: $819|Avg: $290
95%
#151
FirePro M40003
MSRP: $150|Avg: $72
94%
#152
Radeon Pro 465
MSRP: $500|Avg: $150
94%
#154
Tesla P4
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $190
93%
#155
Radeon Pro WX 4150
MSRP: $300|Avg: $120
91%
#158
Quadro M2200
MSRP: $500|Avg: $70
89%
#159
Quadro M4000
MSRP: $791|Avg: $350
88%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce GTX 1650 uses modern memory architecture. The GeForce GTX 1650 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon Pro WX 7100 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon Pro WX 7100 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightGeForce GTX 1650Radeon Pro WX 7100
Performance
Leading raw performance (+2.2%)
Lower raw frame rates (-2.2%)
Longevity
Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $75 versus $180 for the Radeon Pro WX 7100, it costs 58% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 145.2% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightGeForce GTX 1650Radeon Pro WX 7100
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+145.2%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($75)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($180)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and Radeon Pro WX 7100

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

AMD

Radeon Pro WX 7100

The Radeon Pro WX 7100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 10 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1188 MHz to 1243 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,701 points. Launch price was $799.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 and the Radeon Pro WX 7100 reaches 7,701 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Radeon Pro WX 7100 uses GCN 4.0, both on 12 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2,304 (Radeon Pro WX 7100). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 5.728 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 7100). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1243 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon Pro WX 7100
G3D Mark Score
7,869+2%
7,701
Architecture
Turing
GCN 4.0
Process Node
12 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
896
2304+157%
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.984 TFLOPS
5.728 TFLOPS+92%
Boost Clock
1665 MHz+34%
1243 MHz
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
56
144+157%
L1 Cache
896 KB+56%
576 KB
L2 Cache
1 MB
2 MB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon Pro WX 7100
Upscaling Tech
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 7100 has 8 GB. The Radeon Pro WX 7100 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2 MB (Radeon Pro WX 7100) — the Radeon Pro WX 7100 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon Pro WX 7100
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
8 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB
2 MB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12.0 (Radeon Pro WX 7100). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon Pro WX 7100
DirectX
12
12.0
Vulkan
1.4+27%
1.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
3
4+33%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro WX 7100). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro WX 7100).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon Pro WX 7100
Encoder
NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
VCE 3.4
Decoder
NVDEC 4th gen
UVD 6.3
Codecs
H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Radeon Pro WX 7100's 130W — a 53.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 7100). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80°C.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon Pro WX 7100
TDP
75W-42%
130W
Recommended PSU
300W-14%
350W
Power Connector
None
PCIe-powered
Length
229mm
241mm
Height
111mm
112mm
Slots
2
1-50%
Temp (Load)
70°C-13%
80°C
Perf/Watt
104.9+77%
59.2
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $75, while the Radeon Pro WX 7100 launched at $799 and now averages $180. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 58.3% less ($105 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 42.8 (Radeon Pro WX 7100) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 145.1% better value. The GeForce GTX 1650 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2016).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon Pro WX 7100
MSRP
$149-81%
$799
Avg Price (30d)
$75-58%
$180
Performance per Dollar
104.9+145%
42.8
Codename
TU117
Ellesmere
Release
April 23 2019
November 10 2016
Ranking
#323
#331