GeForce GTX 1650
VS
Radeon R4

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon R4

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

2019Core: 1485 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon R4

2017Core: 1183 MHzBoost: 1124 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R4

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
2097%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
2014%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
1991%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
1987%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
1983%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
1972%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
1947%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1940%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1922%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
1917%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
1894%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1890%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
1855%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
1854%
#264
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
2312%
#279
Radeon R4
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
100%
#281
Radeon R7 A10-8750
MSRP: $250|Avg: $30
99%
#282
Radeon HD 6410D
MSRP: $70|Avg: $70
98%
#284
Radeon HD 3850 AGP
MSRP: $130|Avg: $130
96%
#285
Radeon R9 M280X
MSRP: $250|Avg: $50
94%
#286
Radeon HD 5470
MSRP: $83|Avg: $83
93%
#287
GeForce GT 220
MSRP: $69|Avg: $49
93%
#288
Radeon R7 A10-8850
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
89%
#290
GeForce G210
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
86%
#291
Radeon HD 4850 X2
MSRP: $399|Avg: $40
82%
#292
Radeon HD 4330
MSRP: $50|Avg: $9
78%
#293
GeForce GTX 260
MSRP: $449|Avg: $449
77%
#294
Radeon HD 8490
MSRP: $99|Avg: $35
77%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce GTX 1650 uses modern memory architecture. The GeForce GTX 1650 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R4 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2174.3% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (4 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R4.

InsightGeForce GTX 1650Radeon R4
Performance
Leading raw performance (+2174.3%)
Lower raw frame rates (-2174.3%)
Longevity
Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+700%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $75 (vs $20), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 506.5% better value per dollar than the Radeon R4.

InsightGeForce GTX 1650Radeon R4
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+506.5%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($75)
More affordable ($20)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and Radeon R4

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

AMD

Radeon R4

The Radeon R4 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1183 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 346 points. Launch price was $79.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Radeon R4's 346 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 2174.3%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Radeon R4 uses GCN 4.0, both on 12 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 384 (Radeon R4). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 0.9085 TFLOPS (Radeon R4). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1124 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon R4
G3D Mark Score
7,869+2174%
346
Architecture
Turing
GCN 4.0
Process Node
12 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
896+133%
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.984 TFLOPS+228%
0.9085 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1665 MHz+48%
1124 MHz
ROPs
32+100%
16
TMUs
56+133%
24
L1 Cache
896 KB+833%
96 KB
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
0.5 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon R4
Upscaling Tech
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R4 has 512 MB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon R4) — the GeForce GTX 1650 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon R4
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+700%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
0.5 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Radeon R4's 50W — a 40% difference. The Radeon R4 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (Radeon R4). Power connectors: None vs None.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon R4
TDP
75W
50W-33%
Recommended PSU
300W-14%
350W
Power Connector
None
None
Length
229mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
Temp (Load)
70°C
Perf/Watt
104.9+1420%
6.9
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $75, while the Radeon R4 launched at $100 and now averages $20. The Radeon R4 costs 73.3% less ($55 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 17.3 (Radeon R4) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 506.4% better value. The GeForce GTX 1650 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2017).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon R4
MSRP
$149
$100-33%
Avg Price (30d)
$75
$20-73%
Performance per Dollar
104.9+506%
17.3
Codename
TU117
Lexa
Release
April 23 2019
April 20 2017
Ranking
#323
#773