GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon R5 M330

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R5 M330

#469

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

2185%

#471

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

1980%

#472

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

1975%

#476

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

1796%

#477

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

1784%

#479

Radeon HD 8510G + 8500M Dual

MSRP: $120|Avg: $35

100%

#480

Radeon R5 M330

MSRP: $120|Avg: $20

100%

#481

Radeon HD 8650G + 7600M Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $40

100%

#482

GeForce GTX 760A

MSRP: $249|Avg: $40

99%

#483

Radeon R9 M270X

MSRP: $250|Avg: $40

97%

#484

Mobility Radeon HD 5470

MSRP: $49|Avg: $15

97%

#485

Radeon R7 M260

MSRP: $110|Avg: $110

96%

#486

Mobility Radeon HD 5000 Serisi

MSRP: $100|Avg: $25

96%

#487

Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8570M Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $50

96%

#488

Radeon R7 A10-7800

MSRP: $155|Avg: $30

96%

#489

Radeon HD 8450G + 8670M Dual

MSRP: $100|Avg: $100

96%

#490

Radeon HD 7660G + HD 8670M Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

95%

#491

Radeon HD 6450A

MSRP: $55|Avg: $15

95%

#492

Radeon HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

95%

#493

Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7600M Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $50

94%

#494

Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8670M Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $35

91%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce GTX 1650 uses modern memory architecture. The GeForce GTX 1650 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R5 M330 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1220.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R5 M330.

Insight	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon R5 M330
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+1220.3%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1220.3%)
Longevity	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN (2012−2015))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	—

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $75 (vs $20), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 252.1% better value per dollar than the Radeon R5 M330.

Insight	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon R5 M330
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+252.1%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($75)	✅More affordable ($20)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

Radeon R5 M330 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

No prediction data available

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

No prediction data available

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and Radeon R5 M330

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Radeon R5 M330

The Radeon R5 M330 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 9 2015. It features the GCN architecture. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 596 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Radeon R5 M330's 596 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 1220.3%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Radeon R5 M330 uses GCN, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1,024 (Radeon R5 M330).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon R5 M330
G3D Mark Score	7,869+1220%	596
Architecture	Turing	GCN
Process Node	12 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	896	1024+14%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon R5 M330
Upscaling Tech	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	FSR 3 (Compatible)	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon R5 M330
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	128 GB/s	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12 (FL11_1) (Radeon R5 M330). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon R5 M330
DirectX	12	12 (FL11_1)
Vulkan	1.4+8%	1.3
OpenGL	4.6+5%	4.4
Max Displays	3	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs UVD (Radeon R5 M330). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs VCE. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs H.264,HEVC,MPEG-4,MVC (Radeon R5 M330).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon R5 M330
Encoder	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)	UVD
Decoder	NVDEC 4th gen	VCE
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9	H.264,HEVC,MPEG-4,MVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Radeon R5 M330's 75W — a 0% difference. The Radeon R5 M330 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (Radeon R5 M330). Power connectors: None vs Mobile. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 95°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon R5 M330
TDP	75W	75W
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	Mobile
Length	229mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	70°C-26%	95°C
Perf/Watt	104.9+1228%	7.9

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $75, while the Radeon R5 M330 launched at $120 and now averages $20. The Radeon R5 M330 costs 73.3% less ($55 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 29.8 (Radeon R5 M330) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 252% better value. The GeForce GTX 1650 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2015).